When people buy them you do get commission from skimlinks. I don't really care I'm just pointing that out.
When people buy them you do get commission from skimlinks. I don't really care I'm just pointing that out.
When people buy them you do get commission from skimlinks. I don't really care I'm just pointing that out.
When people buy them you do get commission from skimlinks. I don't really care I'm just pointing that out.
I've used similar kits and it worked great. The only thing I would add is some type of sealer to use afterwards.
I've used similar kits and it worked great. The only thing I would add is some type of sealer to use afterwards.
Planning to remove the cross-support or just mesh over it? This is really the only part of the car I don't like but I understand why it's there.
As carmakers increasingly benchmark one another, we've seen vehicles that are increasingly difficult to tell apart. What is the philosophical difference behind the Toyota Camry and Hyundai Sonata, for instance?
Speaking of Fiat Chrysler, they're recalling about 26,000 new Chrysler 200 V6 models in North America because their rotary shift knobs won't go into park. Do you really need park? You can just drive around until you run out of gas and then take the bus home. America's become so soft. Anyway, here's the Detroit News:
For example, maybe Apple will just buy Tesla Motors outright. That's what entrepreneur and venture capitalist Jason Calacanis predicted the other day to the tune of $75 billion. Within the next 18 months. (!!!) I don't buy it, and this Motley Fool story explains why. You should read the whole thing.
Or they could just make GMC be trucks and SUVs and not sell them under multiple brands.
They are pretty polarizing. I think it's on purpose. You either love it or hate it but at least you notice it more than the Toyota with a Lexus badge of the past.
Plus it worked out for Dodge with SRT, right?
Tesla Ute?
Instead, Musk said that Tesla plans to focus on getting the 3 to market in 2017, "and then innovate on that platform with future iterations and put aside any schedule or volume [concerns]." That's a similar tack it's taken with the Model X, using the Model S platform and drivetrain to develop its SUV.
That's the first time I've seen any rendering of a possible hatch back. If it comes in a hatch I'm going to shit myself.
Absolutely not. Anyone who thinks people are cross shopping a fugly Bolt with a Tesla are delusional. I'd say GM is more afraid of Tesla. Which is a change from a few years ago when GM said Tesla wouldn't make it or had no impact on them.
I love Tesla but they screwed up here. Rear should have been more crossover like. This thing basically adds no utility over the Model S. I guess screwed up in my eye doesn't mean much when 20k are already reserved. It's uglier than the S, likely has a lower range, and has really no benefit. Count me out (not that I'm…
Saw one in Tampa, FL a few weeks ago. Tried to snap a pic but didn't catch. I wonder if it's imported or if someone chopped up a g6?
How easy would it be to load those too.
The only thing I know is I'll probably never buy a new car in my life. This thing is going to be awesome for 30k used.
Doesn't Cadillac have a "vsport" that is kind of the bridge between plebeian and V.
Sign up for a test drive on the Tesla website. They had me driving the next weekend. I told them I had no intention of buying a Model S.
I agree. I'm highly interested in the Model 3, which hasn't seen the light of day yet, after driving a Model S. I have no desire to even drive the Bolt. Does anyone else remember when GM wasn't worried about Tesla at all?