sprozolo
sprozolo
sprozolo

Because that is what we do now. We can’t let people do anything good in this world without sifting through their past to find a reason to vilify them.

None, but there’s a rumor that Barron’s autistic.

A thing about the “polls are dead” argument...

This post comes across as petty, mean-spirited, and ill-informed, IMO.

To put it simply, they are cultural leaders and ambassadors of goodwill. Their special place in society allows them to “give back” by bringing attention to charitable causes. They also provide entertainment/distraction, boost public morale, and of course, attract “that sweet, sweet tourism revenue.” Whether or not you

It’s to preserve the legitimacy of government and the unitary power of the Prime Minister for one thing. If they did it like a proper country they’d have to have an elected president who would actually have a mandate to exercise the same powers that the Queen doesn’t exercise. Plus, as the post notes, the Queen gets

The Letter Signers are in the right on this one, looking at it. Or at least they are if this part is true:

Jezebel writers criticizing someone who did nothing wrong? Things really are starting to get back to normal around here.

Maybe I’m missing something, but I feel like this post is a weird attempt to take issue with Falahee’s statement despite the fact that there is nothing wrong with it.

I stayed at my parents’ house this weekend and had a long chat with my mom, who pointed something interesting out.

Cheers, finally some damn common sense! People want to go apoplectic on each other and refuse to understand where things went wrong when we have a perfect example of exactly how to run a fucking campaign who’s still in office for 2 more months.

Yeah, this is what blows my mind. Obama literally did this twice, and it worked. He got all classes behind him. And yet these DNC liberal goons are appopleptic at the thought of repeating that success.

Lots of people are suffering. You can appeal to everyone at the same time. Its not mutually exclusive to talk about issues that face minorities and issues that face the white working class. Obama did this for two election and was able to win.

I keep repeating this to no avail. But will try again.

Eh, I’ve been around. I was browbeaten into submission during the primaries, fought the good fight for Clinton in the general, worried about each mistake and called them out in turn, but ultimately stayed loyal to the party. Of course, if you even thought about voting for a socialist in the primaries, you’re among

Democrats are obsessed with purity tests, Republicans know its about bodies pulling the right lever.

Yes. Also, consider the section of the exit poll (NYT link below) where they broke down the vote by “Family Financial Situation” For those whose family financial situation is “Better Today” Clinton won 72-24. For those who said it was “about the same” it was tied 46-46. For those who said it was “Worse Today”

Agreed.

Here’s our plan, from what I can tell:

sort of like being a woman in Afghanistan