springrenewal
Pink Footpath
springrenewal

No. The team is in a 4-on-5 on the frontline because someone decided to play Hanzo or Widow. This player’s kills (assuming they’re numerous enough, and are the right ones at the right time) can deliver a nice advantage, but if they don’t (and they often don’t, because these players tend to be indiscriminate in their

The difference with Tracer is that she’s far easier to do damage with than Genji, her ult charges really fast, and she’s significantly more survivable. And if Reaper is at least trying to apply some damage to tanks, he’s pretty useful. My experience with Genji players has often been that they spend a lot of the match

And yep, you guessed it - I, as a Lucio main and a “discount dspStanky”, have no respect for 95% of Widows I encounter because I can counter them in 1v1 during the match. Hanzos are actually more deadly in close quarters combat, and (unlike Widows) they are less situational.

He can be an absolute terror if you’re good with him. I’m not, so I never go Hanzo but I don’t judge anyone for picking him out of the gate.

This is gonna sound horrible but the only hero I’ll ever insta-pick is Soldier.

SURE, they will tell you they will switch, and if they do at best they will switch to Widow.

“The other day, this guy reamed me for picking Hanzo, even though I was leading the team in kills three minutes in,” said Hayes.

The problem I see is that, however loudly we wave these banners, the most we’ll ever get is lip service. Politicians will start talking more about inequality, and perhaps even tout things like the guaranteed minimum income. But the small print will be that social programs get slashed, and the guaranteed minimum income

I’m not saying it’s neccessary right now, but as we move in this direction of ever-widening inequality, the number of possibilities diminishes. I mean, wouldn’t you agree? Reform becomes less of an option the more entrenched these problems become.

However, extolling the “benefits” and “necessity” of Marxism is of course laughable.

See, this is hilarious, because you’re treating the subject like it can be solved between me and you. If you just rail hard enough and trot out your anti-Marxist drivel, the issue will go away. Sorry, but it’s not going to come down to this exchange in these comments right here. If you like the system you’ve got, you

Marxism is a dead ideology proven to be completely shit whether it was 80 years ago or today in 2017. Fucking parasites I swear.

And yet, at the same time, as the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, the only apparent leverage we’ve got is the threat of violent, mass systemic overthrow. Why else should the rich agree to pay these (surely exorbitant, by their standards) taxes to sustain “people who do nothing”? They have no incentive to

The answer is simple: a guaranteed minimum income paid for by taxing the owner class that’s profiting from technological changes.

It wouldn’t be fair for the women there if a man identified as a woman that day and they let him play.

This unfortunately isn’t a Reddit-only thing. It appears to be a part of human sociology.

His account is probably either banned, or on its way to being banned, since I flagged every post he’s written in the past couple months containing the C-word. He’s very fond of that word.

The only reason why they don’t is because it costs them money not to. They’re just trying to navigate this thing they don’t want to do in such a way that it doesn’t turn into bad press.

One of Keighley’s only redeeming qualities is that he’s friends with Kojima.

The problem with how the advertisers are thinking about this comes down to the primary differences between online video content and TV content. While someone might reasonably flip through the channels and see that your product is being advertised over content they find objectionable and lodge a complaint about it, the