sprazola
sprazola
sprazola

At first people at Gawker were super jazzed when they thought the attackers were “three white men”. Then it turned out to be a couple brown people. In an attempt to salvage the politicization of a tragedy, the narrative quickly changed to that of an evil man who had brainwashed a poor innocent women into committing a

Rough fucking week for Jezzies. Furiously hoping for shooters to be white men, and the architect turns out to be woman of color.

It is a gun control issue.

It does, you just dont understand it.

can you really not distinguish between someone acting on behalf of an organization composed of tens of thousands of people with an express mission and one mentally unstable individual shooting up a bunch of people?

Exactly.

No shit, Professor Einstein.

Oooohh Gawker and Jezebel get so conflicted when they have to choose to side between black people and white women.

Religion.

Probably getting the same boner everyone on Gawker got when they thought it was crazy white christians.

The backpedaling in this thread is gonna be breathtaking.

From 2010 (last census) till today (even if we assume these men are indeed white and counting the PP shooter), white people have committed 11 mass shootings according to the MJ database and non-white people have committed 12, even though white people are 60~% of the population.

Profiling and stereotyping is fun and legitimate, when it suits my political narratives: The Post.

Wow so insensitive to the deaf.

The term "racism" seems to be used in different ways by different people. Obviously modern liberals and progressives take the term to imply a power structure, but lots of definitions of racism don't implicitly involve a power dynamic. Here are some other ways racism is defined: "the belief that some races to be

"A "critical mass of faculty members and students" felt that it was inappropriate for a student leader to make fun of members of the community she had been tasked with representing. Peterson herself seems to recognize as much and admitted that the photo was a mistake."

Ugh. There was a case here in Massachusetts with a guy who was caught in online chats planning to abduct, rape, murder and eat children - he'd even prepared a home dungeon (wired with cable tv and a child-sized coffin, no less). But, in that case, the defendant didn't claim it was a fantasy; he actually confessed, and

So, a couple things. The misuse of the police databases to the side, I always thought this story was kind of weak. This guy appears to be disturbed, but I had trouble seeing that he'd done anything illegal. Looking around and researching things, regardless of how reprehensible is not actually illegal. It seems the

I mean that's true. How would you like it if the frequent "Kill yourselves" you all throw around here were charged with a felony for aiding, advising or encouraing suicide. If he is convicted for some dumb shit he said on the internet and fantasizing then it sets a dangerous precedent.