So leaving Iraqis to be killed, tortured by the ruthless regime of Saddam Hussein was good? I can’t keep track, what with all of the protests of Trump being heartless towards refugees.

No. Read the NY Times.

Yeah, that’s what I thought. Cop out.

The premature end that blew up in his face and gave us the refugee crisis.

Journalistic integrity = pissing in your ear and telling you what you want to believe.

Wow! Wow!

Sounds reasonable but the left is working overtime to blame Trump.

Pretty much every other source is disputing Reuters. Plus the military does the planning, not the President. From the Trump loving NYTimes:

Correct, there were two. One the left describes as a ‘war monger,’ and he came in #2.

You sound well-adjusted.

Who was President from 2001 to 2008? The guy you considered the “war monger” who had less drone strikes than Obama.

Sorry Mr Revision, he drew the red line. The narcissist wanted to sound tough, then he didn’t back it up, turned his back, and look at the refugee and humanitarian crisis now.

The ‘most drone bombings ever’ President of Peace

Maybe Obama shouldn’t have drawn a red line with Syria that he had no interest in honoring, and then turning his back while hundreds of thousands were murdered and millions more fled as refugees.

The Yemen raid was planned by the military. They wanted Obama to sign up in the last month of his Presidency but the weather didn’t cooperate.

Democrats weren’t sold on Garland. They were banking that Hillary would win, and then they would get someone younger and more liberal. The far left wing disliked the Garland pick. That’s why they didn’t make more noise about it.

Democrats weren’t sold on Garland. They were banking that Hillary would win, and then they would get someone younger and more liberal. The far left wing disliked the Garland pick. That’s why they didn’t make more noise about it.

Cool, bring the nuclear option, then the next opening Trump gets to fill can be Judge Pryor.

It’s the Schumer-Biden rule. They stated they wouldn’t allow Bush to add another justice to the SCOTUS if another opening came up. The fact that another opening never came up is immaterial - their intent still stands. So the hypocrisy started with them.

It’s the Schumer-Biden rule. They stated they wouldn’t fill allow Bush to add another justice if another opening came up. The fact that another opening never came up is immaterial - their intent still stands. So the hypocrisy started with them.