Hahaha, I did get pretty comfortable in the area (and also, am a native Brooklynite so I didn't have a license or car when I lived in MPLS, so didn't get to venture too far away from my little hub). I honestly miss it every day.
Hahaha, I did get pretty comfortable in the area (and also, am a native Brooklynite so I didn't have a license or car when I lived in MPLS, so didn't get to venture too far away from my little hub). I honestly miss it every day.
Geek guys have a lot of misandry to deal with! Go on Xbox and if someone finds out you are a guy, you get messages and bothered with things like Penis Or Get Out (POGO) or heterophobia like getting called a breeder. Nevermind the casual racism of all the "cr*cker" comments flying around. And they have to play games…
You'd be surprised how something like this being done in a neighborhood that isn't incredibly beautiful can actually start the process of turing an entire area around.
So sick of this stupid argument. False fucking equivalency. You would never assume a white person was changing their appearance to appear not white because there's no "not white" privilege to be gained from that. There is privilege to be gained by a person of color who tries to emulate the physical characteristics of…
White people tan, get lip injections, and butt injections to ape a small part of Blackness. The idea is that some of the features of Black women that are considered ugly, when watered down and put on a white woman, are beautiful. Ain't white supremacy fascinating?
I don't think that's directly on their mind, but it's how we've been conditioned. It's not a coincidence that Caucasian features are considered more attractive and thus more marketable, that's the society we live in. So someone getting this surgery isn't necessarily thinking "I want to look whiter", but their decision…
And the Lakers have already deleted the tweet. Although I think they've made things a little worse. Check out their feed now:
#NeverForget
They've had commercials for books since at least the 90's.
Come on "Ultra NES"!
Agreed. I don't often like the romantic stuff. I like the stuff where the woman is very clearly having a good time-even if its crazy hard BDSM stuff, you can tell. THAT'S good porn. THAT makes a huge difference.
So he's Stoya's boyfriend, right? They're so fucking coy about the whole thing.
I watch this movie on a regular basis. It is horribly dated. But it is still so much stupid fun.
Just because you send a text does not mean the person MUST open it right that very second. Its not an imperative. It's entirely up to the recipient whether or not they choose to read and reply to their messages.
Think about this. By your logic one could also be liable for sending an email, tweeting, or posting a status update on Facebook—anything that could produce a notification on someone's smart phone—while they are driving. So if I have to email a coworker about something but know they're on their morning commute I must…
So explain to me how the sender is at all responsible for the actions of the recipient How is a sender in control of what the driver does? How is a sender FORCING the driver the answer? Hint: they are not.
SO WHAT IF IM ON TWITTER?
There is absolutely no logical reason for holding someone accountable for being on the sending end of a cell phone communication of any sort. Exactly because of what you said - the driver has a choice to be distracted or even have their phone on at all. If someone's sitting in the seat next to you, and all of a sudden…
Even accounting for that, you're now removing all personal responsibility for the driver who WILLINGLY answered the message and then got into an accident.
So we are getting rid of all personal responsibility?