So, this “article” is about something that HAS NOT happened, and contains assumptions based on hearsay (in 1 paper) about something that MAYBE may or may not happen.

Is’nt there a minimum educational requirement to get a writing gig on this site? The level of sheer ignorance in this article is even more astounding that it usually is from Jez articles.

If “everyone” voted like you claim, then there’s no way trump would’ve won, or no way the Dems can’t get a clear majority in the senate or house for the past few cycles. So not sure which multiverse you’re referring to.

You know, if thousands of “progressives” prefer to spend more time & energy on protesting & rage-tweeting, instead of registering, then that’s the simplest definition of “not voting” - you’re doing semantics here for people who don’t care about anything except “looking” like they care.

Voting & Not-voting (or waste-voting) has consequences. This (& the gun ruling yesterday) is a result of the latter in 2016.

Voting & Not-voting (or waste-voting) has consequences. This (& the gun ruling yesterday) is a result of the latter in 2016.

Voting & Not-voting (or waste-voting) has consequences. This (& the gun ruling yesterday) is a result of the latter in 2016.

So, this purported “women’s” site is against something that a large, large majority of women athletes are in favour of....okaaayyyy then.

The Beastie Boys copied the cadence and rhyme flows of Black artists in the 80s and used their whiteness as a vehicle to reach mainstream heights.

“In any case, I feel very happy and safe living in a society in which a man can beat a woman within an inch of her life, then make her pay $15 million for talking about it!”

Yea, I presumed wrongly that it was 12, wow for you; it was still a unanimous decision though, and based on higher standards & burdens of proof than was used in England.

Well, I hope the single judge that gave that ‘wifebeater’ judgement can face the public if or when Heard goes up on perjury charges over there for that as is being mentioned now.

Wow, how worse can these “takes/articles” get. Just when you think they’ve gotten bad, they lower the bar!

The judge using the term “wifebeater” was not indicative of objectivity in any form at all; he definitely had personal issues with Depp, or was putting way too much emphasis on what the SUN “newspaper” published.

Said by someone who obviously knows nothing about the libel-tourism industry in England, where it’s easy to win these things, and who knows nothing about judges who feel they are literal kings over there.

The SUN “newspaper” is the newspaper equivalent of trump, i.e. only capable of lies (still never apologised to the Liverpool Hillborough families 33 years & counting).

The SUN “newspaper” is the newspaper equivalent of trump, i.e. only capable of lies (still never apologised to the Liverpool Hillborough families 33 years & counting).

Watched the preview for this after finishing Slow Horses a couple days ago; nce surprise.

Should’ve won the Oscar instead of Hoffman for Rain Man.

That sounds like something you’d see a doctor say on a pornhub video;-)