People usually tell you you’re dumb because you’re obviously fucking dumb. Your asinine non-question was answered in the sentences IMMEDIATELY following the one you quoted, so at best you’ve got the attention span of a drunk toddler. Try harder.
People usually tell you you’re dumb because you’re obviously fucking dumb. Your asinine non-question was answered in the sentences IMMEDIATELY following the one you quoted, so at best you’ve got the attention span of a drunk toddler. Try harder.
Danti,
It’s not Racism; it might be racism. That’s the problem with the word. At its most basic level racism (little ‘r’) just means ‘a prejudice based on race’. Under that definition anyone can be (and often is) racist.
Even if the “smokey eye” joke was a reference to her appearance, it was a complimentary reference. It’s like saying, “Gotta hand it to those Nazis, they look sharp in those uniforms” -- that’s a compliment right there.
Well, there was at least one mistake. Her being too thin-skinned to take ribbing that the Bush II administration handled without whining isn’t anyone’s fault but her own. There’s a lot to find inappropriate about the Correspondent’s Dinner, but “too unkind to the Administration about actual things they’ve done”…
looking for clarification beyond “if you don’t understand, then you’re dumb” which is what I usually get.
Right?! STOP FUCKING APOLOGIZING TO THIS WOMAN FOR SOMETHING THAT NEVER HAPPENED. The jokes weren’t about her goddamn appearance, and I don’t believe that she doesn’t understand that. Fuck her.
Yeah, I don’t get it either. Those tweets are racist, but:
Because actual racism is contingent on a power differential between the oppressor and the oppressed, and rooted in a fundamental belief in superiority of one race over another.
If a non-white person says something like what what Jeong said, the implicit meaning of the text is “hey, white people, can you stop being…
Sarah Jeong is one of the best writers on the internet, and every person complaining about her tweets should have a court appointed guardian because they are too stupid to oversee their own affairs.
No, too simple, too clean.
Well - I mean, other than the Russian cheating - if you don’t know, you better ask somebody
Some men just want to watch the world burn.
To all the whiney-ass conservative victims crying about being called out by private orgs and citizens for their shitty actions, THIS is what a real violation of the first amendment looks like, to a t.
Every republican politician and appointment DJT has made... and every member of 45's family is complicit in ALL of this. That’s a decent passel of bullets to satisfy requirements.
Honestly this is almost beautiful in its’ blatant insanity. So pure. I read a lot of cosmic horror growing up but this creeps me out on a whole ‘nother level.
The fact that he constantly calls any news that portrays him in the negative as “fake” should be reason enough to impeach him, since he’s trying to set up a system where only one source of information, him, can be trusted.
Summary execution for this treasonous sack of shit.
I find it incredible that any news organization not named “Fox News” would ever trust that Trump would act in good faith on...anything.