spider-dan
Spider-Dan
spider-dan

If your point the whole time was “Biden is not a progressive,” you wouldn’t need to pull quotes about him telling rich people “You’ll still be just fine if taxes are raised” to do it. He’s directly said he is not a progressive, and I haven’t seen anyone claiming he is.

There is no need to re-read and think about it: the Lincoln Project, comprised primarily of ghoulish neocons, are infinitely more helpful at defeating fascism in America than DSA, Our Revolution, and the Sunrise Movement combined. Because you can’t make any meaningful change without first winning elections, and the

Most simply put, he will not go anywhere far enough, and that’s shown clearly by him saying to these rich people that they have nothing to worry about.

He’s saying it directly to rich people!

Preaching incrementalism while the building is burning down around you, and arguing over whether to use the expired fire extinguisher on the corner, or maybe call the fire department, isn’t dignified statecraft at work.

“240 miles of range is not a meaningful advantage over 120" is a pretty spicy take, especially given that:

Just to be clear: when you repeatedly insist that $37,500 is a totally absurd, spit-out-your-drink MSRP for the Bolt - a price that completely invalidates any further discussion or interest - you are aware that it won multiple Car of the Year awards at that price? That (again, at that very same MSRP) it sold

Why would Tesla need/want to sell a $20k car any more than BMW or Jaguar? They’re doing just fine in the luxury segment.

I don’t see why the MSRP - not the price it’s selling for, but just the MSRP - is that important. Even if you go to the website, the default Build & Price is $29,390 including destination. It also seems kind of silly to criticize GM for real-world pricing that’s lower than the MSRP when the market leader (Tesla) makes

Even with the dropouts, 2020's Super Tuesday had significantly more active candidates than almost any other cycle. The idea that there were going to be 4+ moderate candidates splitting the centrist vote in April was always a delusional fantasy.

This sounds like asking, “Why do people still live in Florida after Hurricane Andrew in 1992?”

It’s neither FCA nor DC.

Good thing you were smart enough not to get seriously sick, be laid off unexpectedly, or be injured in, say, a car accident due to no fault of your own.  Setting a noble example there.

When sociopaths like this guy look at their standing, they never look down. All they can do is look above and think, “What do I need to do to be the next Jeff Bezos?”

It is rather stunning to see this article downplay and dismiss Biden committing to a choosing a woman for VP while somehow simultaneously managing to praise Bernie for waffling on the same question because of reasons that have nothing to do with the question at hand. (“Bernie is the only candidate truly fighting

Yes, the dastardly voters have rigged the primary yet again.

The idea that the public proclamations of the head of state in the most powerful country in the world should “just be ignored” is... not a useful suggestion.

STICK TO SPROTS CARS

You’re almost there! The real insight is, “Democrats are never going to be behind someone like Bernie because his frequently stated goal is to defeat the longtime leaders they respect.” Do you think “We need to get people like Jim Clyburn out of office” is a winning message in SC?

It’s like none of these clowns paid attention after we tried this in 2000.