Still waiting for you to explain why alt accounts are a “problem” in the first place.
Still waiting for you to explain why alt accounts are a “problem” in the first place.
Let us set aside your impressively casual claim that Blizzard has an international database of voiceprint-identified players (or can roll out such a technology at a cost that is to be deemed insignificant, both financially and socially).
The problem with the flowchart here is that the white woman in question definitely witnessed a felony, in that said black man was certainly kidnapping a child that wasn’t his. I mean, are you saying that kidnapping is not a serious crime?
So instead, you’re saying that every pro player who wants to play on a secondary account just needs to have a second PC to do so. Got it.
So if you have a roommate (or multiple roommates!), you’re going to get fined and your roommate’s account is going to get deleted?
The linked article “explaining” why Philly shouldn’t try to get LeBron is beyond dumb. His primary points are that LeBron the GM will blackmail you into signing the players he chooses, and saddle you with contracts you may not want after he leaves.
So as an example of why counties matter, you cite an example of people... moving across state lines. Right.
You just agreed that the same field was considered strong at the start of the cycle. The rest is hindsight revisionism based on how they did against Trump, who was expected to lose badly when he entered. Everyone greatly underestimated the appeal of white nationalism, both in the primary and in the general. (And no,…
Do we literally need to go through every team and list all the potential HOFers from 2003-now?
It sounds like you believe that Harden, Curry, and Thompson were all equally good shooters as rookies as they are today. Because if what you are claiming is true, rookie Steph Curry could have jacked up ten 3s a game at the same FG%.
A player that only takes three 3s a game is not taking the same kind of shots that a player who takes eight 3s a game is. They are wide open blown assignments or the occasional shot-clock force, not contested 3s like in today’s era.
Explain exactly how the popular vote has any relevance in electing a US President.
It’s the same reason why Obama is the only former President that is criticized for a paid speaking event (even though the rest of them do it all the time), or why Hillary is the only losing Presidential candidate that needs to shut up and disappear (unlike Gore, Kerry, McCain, or Romney).
In point of fact, the popular vote has much more impact on the outcome of an election happening today than which party won three elections ago - the factor you are claiming as immutable.
If you’re saying Jordan played against more HOFers than LeBron did, that’s going to be be difficult to measure until many years from now. But if you’re citing John Starks and Reggie Miller as the threshold of “all time greats,” I’m pretty sure LeBron has played against more. I mean, LBJ has played against a third of…
It’s funny how you want to talk about historical trends, yet you casually dismiss the fact that the Democrats have won the popular vote in 6 of the last 7 elections (and the one loss was vs. a wartime incumbent). It seems to me that losing the popular vote and winning the electoral college is actually a more difficult…
LeBron ended the runs of two championship teams: the Chauncey/Rip Pistons and the Garnett/Pierce/Allen Celtics. I think the latter qualified as a great team.
Jordan beat Magic and Isiah in the playoffs exactly once, both in the same postseason. Neither of those two would ever make it out of the first round again; suffice it to say they were washed up after the ‘91 playoffs. Jordan lost literally every playoff game he played against Larry Bird, so he’s probably not a good…
Jordan’s competition was, if not terrible, aggressively mediocre. Outside of ‘91, a legitimate run where CHI ended the Bad Boys and best a mostly washed up Lakers team, all Jordan ever did was beat teams who couldn’t win anything if their life depended on it.
So by “stronger candidate,” you mean... the kind of people Trump beat in the GOP primary. Got it.