Probably...

The counter argument is that the American presence is a stabilizing force that’s helped prevent a repeat of WW2

If it is blocked in the Senate, Dems should run on it in 2020.

Which is really, REALLY depressing, seeing as Yang has actual policies - and supporting research - that make sense.

because unless you think we should abolish the US military entirely,

I don’t know, let’s look at her article:

I’ve met fucking no one that suggests voting for Warren because she is a woman.

Peacemaking is good. Good effort here.

But keep in mind a primary candidate needs 15% vote share to get any delegates at all. Any candidate who doesn’t meet that threshold will not have delegates to release to their allies.

If Warren can’t get to 15% by Iowa, she will be siphoning votes for nothing. Also no guarantee…

Dems need to draw a line. Make R’s vote against this.

The US has murdered 20 million people since the end of WW2, including 2 million Iraqis in just the last 30 years. How do you think this country should be held accountable for these mass killings?

That was a really bad take.

Note that Fight for $15 started in 2012 

we have to match that with operational reality

“On a scale of 0 to 5, he was a 5.0,” Bannon said. “Officer Pantaleo was one of the best officers I’ve supervised.’’

Even in this hypothetical case you need 15% to be awarded any delegates. Likely only 2 of the 5 candidates would meet that barrier.

And I thought the Republican clown car in 2016 was embarrassing.

If Dems do this they will also end up with the worst possible candidate.

Trumka resign bitch

Nice leadership you got there Dems

She is running again but she just lost one of her consultants due to the DCCC’s threats.

Dastardly unions!

Notable allies of corporations and wealthy families....