Once again, I’m not defending any person. I’m defending - to use your own words - a basic right.

I’m not defending a group. I’m refuting the idea that silencing ideas (whatever they may be) that go against what one, or even many find acceptable/right is ever a good thing. What that idea is is irrelevant - the core of what I’m saying is that nobody should be silenced.

No, I don’t support them, but I don’t support ideological tyrants that want to silence those that don’t support their same worldview.

Yeah! Kill the badthinkers! Enforce our peaceful way by force!

The alternative is to make a university wait until a rape conviction has been handed down to discipline/expel the rapist

Great Sports News.

Yet somehow there’s always money for smokes and scratchers.

Counter-Counterpoint: GOD DAMN SQUEAKY SHOES WTF

Ah yes, the old, “People that disagree with me are idiots,” defense. Solid.

Your title is one word too long.

Victim complex + "me me meeeeeeee" mindset.

Disclosure: Quinn formerly dated Kotaku reporter Nathan Grayson

Play of the game:

I never know how to feel when different things I don’t like end up opposed to each other. I don’t want either one of them to come out on top.

/thread

Hating on Joe Walsh should be a crime punishable by summary execution.

Someone go on reddit and get the vacuum guy

Someone go on reddit and get the vacuum guy

oh boy. i can’t wait to have everyone’s opinion on this shoved in my face next time i check facebook.

Finally, a memoir that actually stands a chance of being worthwhile.

But...what if I think they’re both equally awful candidates and neither of them are suited for the job?