speranza2
Speranza
speranza2

I hope they do “Springtime for Hitler.”

Already forcing women to do something with their bodies against their will, and he’s not even president yet.

Because the internet is a relatively new thing for most people and they believe anything presented in a halfass convincing manner is true.

I asked this the other day. Originally I think they did it because they thought the outrage would mean the government was coming for their guns. But after we basically did nothing, they have nothing to worry about. Yet here they are, shitting on dead little kids.

This is a canard perpetuated by the gun lobby. They say Obama and other liberals faked Sandy Hook to make guns look bad.

False flag by the feds, in order to anger the population, turn them against the 2nd Amendment and take away their guns.

So Obama can take our guns.

Can someone please explain to me why people believe Sandy Hook (and others) did NOT happen?? What is the point of the denial?

Jesus Christ, get a fucking clue:

Except for those two digital images of them posing together at the bottom of the article. I guess you are right though, those aren’t literally photographs.

Chill, Vlad.

Reminds me: Do paid Russian trolls consider themselves “Alt Right”, or is it an enemy of my enemy thing?

What exactly do you think the headline should be changed to? “Woman who recently had an abortion at 32 weeks is not a slutty slut so it’s ok”?

She had an abortion for the same reason any woman has an abortion: her own, personal, private reason. Her abortion “reason” is as unhorrifying as anybody’s abortion reason. That’s why you were told to fuck off.

the VAST majority of late-term abortions are for exactly these reasons. you were horrified by your own ignorant assumptions, and that’s on you.

Did you read the “all our rights are intertwined” line at the end? Read it again. And again. And once more, for good measure.

Ok - please all calm down - I didn't express myself clearly and I understand why it came across wrong - my intention was to protect the woman because I thought the headline appeared to be vilifying that someone could have an abortion that late. My mistake - please back off - I'm allowed to make a mistake. I'm totally

I disagree. That title should not be touched. She had a late term abortion. Period. When I read the headline, I felt an emotional pull towards this article, and I knew I was in for a bit of an emotional read. You see, women don’t get abortions because it’s the easy way out, or because they’re sluts, or because they

Yeesh. That’s a completely factual headline that you’ve chosen to see as loaded and misleading.