I laughed at this much more than I should have.

Great story BethBot 98412354, compelling and rich. Here’s Tom with the weather.

He was a secret character in Tactics? That got remade for a couple of Nintendo systems. Not sure if he made it through as a secret on those remakes though.

Seattle would be a cool setting - Here’s hoping Obsidian would handle that game too

Yeah it’ll be a shitshow for sure. Same as it ever was though, I suppose.

He’s using the console on the PC version. I’d guess the commands are similar (or the same) to those used in 3/NV since it is the same engine.

“Select approved mods” or something like that term has been thrown around. I’d guess not all of the cool ones and/or those that require script extenders (which a lot of the really cool ones for 3/NV did).

I see that G15 under the manual you sexy beast! I’m still rocking one of those bad boys too.

I don’t see the comment in question as posted under your account. Might be a bug or something.

I actually don’t know if he did it or not - and neither do you. I know he’s innocent in the eyes of the law because he wasn’t proven guilty - same as you. Call me a stupid fuck all you want. But you don’t know anything about me other than those two points.

Source?

I think his job at ESPN would dispute your statement.

You’ve missed my point. Suing his accuser’s mother isn’t going to do anything but futher harm his rep.

Ray Lewi....oh wait. And he may have KILLED two guys!

In that scenario I’d question myself if he was convicted. Maybe even if he was actually charged. But as it stands...why? Don’t misunderstand me - I’m not confusing “lack of being charged” with “innocent” as a lot of people are. But it’ll pass in time. I mean - Ray Lewis might have killed a couple of guys. There was…

He was mad his case against a star NHL player was essentially scuttled by her stunt. I have no doubt he’d charge her if he could.

You raise a really good question at the end there. Sadly, I don’t have an answer but I fear your conclusion is correct. I would say that the answer isn’t limited to this site (or suite of sites - let’s be honest) but to the media in general. It makes a great headline, stirs up feelings and gets views.

Your usage of “you’re” seems to be the one confused.

Was there significant evidence of who perpetrated the hoax? I suppose that is less needed for a civil case, but you still have to be able to identify that she specifically caused the irreperable harm.

Pretty sure the salary cap caused more problems for the team than this issue did or will.