Not if your path the wastebasket was littered with numerous obstacles and traps. It is actually harder to walk to the wastebasket in that case. Passing is valued in the NFL precisely because it takes less work.
Not if your path the wastebasket was littered with numerous obstacles and traps. It is actually harder to walk to the wastebasket in that case. Passing is valued in the NFL precisely because it takes less work.
First, Cam isn’t a “running QB”. All QB’s run, and being able to run down the field is a tremendous value in all offensive players. Cam is a QB who can gain more yards running up the field than your typical QB. This is an asset. According to Colin Cowturd, it makes him lazy.
That guy should sue you.
It is an aggressive virus than can infect any organism it comes into contact with.
herpes ain’t that bad
Also, please stop policing how much sex people have. Some people fuck everything that moves and that is perfectly ok
I don’t think this is a road you want to go down given the implications of what you suggest. It seems you are saying that one can only be a victim of violence if the perp is larger than them. So Willie Reed can only ever be a victim if the aggressor is over 6'9" and 230 lbs?
Why? Maybe that’s a hangup you need to unpack.
Isn’t your body an essential part of your personhood? Doesn’t the body tend to be the initial source of attraction? Assuming you are heterosexual, are you not attracted to certain men’s bodies?
I whole heartedly believe that his mother would be appalled and scandalized by this painting.
Oh please! The white woman who made this painting is hateful. How could you look at that painting and not be appalled and repulsed by what she did to him? She basically effaced him and made him into the monster that the whites who killed saw. A white woman killed Emmett Till twice. What sort of awareness does this…
No artist is entitled to a public showing of their art.
No one said she didn’t have a right! But that doesn’t mean she SHOULD do it! I personally don’t think whites should be trying to capitalize and profit off the pain and suffering that whites thrust upon blacks. If a white person does decide to make art addressing the oppression of blacks, they should do so anonymously.
Does it matter? Either increase her wealth and capital.
I have a problem that a white woman is doing it. Every time I see something like this, it makes me think that they are trying to assert control over a narrative that we should own.
There is a long history of white artists representing black pain since before the civil war.
Why should that art “get” to be shown?
Oh boo! No one is entitled to have their work hanging up in a gallery. And no on is calling for some legal ban, just for this gallery to use it’s conscience.
This is lame. How could you ever know an artist true intentions? This sounds like a needlessly strict criteria for judging a piece.
This sounds like one of those weak sauce psychology studies that will be hard to replicate. However, I do expect Malcolm Gladwell to write a book about this phenomenon thus spurring an epidemic of people naming their children “Beauty”, “Handsome”, and “High Cheekbones”. It’s still good to see that the magical belief…