Yeah, we’re going to hell for it but you are right, Foie gras is a must try, I had a big debate with my wife about it in a swanky restaurant that used to be our local pub til they did it up, she refused to eat it on moral grounds, I told her I agreed but she should still try it once, just so she could understand that…

Also known as Skin-Up-Duck here in the UK! Every Chinese takeaway does it, though we mostly have Hoi-Sin sauce with our ducks. We also have Mongolian Lamb which is the same deal, soft meat with crispy bits, that’s wrapped up in Gem Lettuce leafs with Plum sauce, very tasty indeed.

That’s the classic Chan Hyperbole that we’ve learnt to love and loathe, I’m just a little disappointed that you didn’t find it ‘so satisfying’!!

Isnt it amazing what some people will pay. I go to our local Bags R Us style cheapo shop and spend around a Tenner, sure i have to do this every 5 years or so, but still, I wouldn’t spend £60-£70 on a Laptop bag.

No, please do spoil it someone, i canna watch the vid a work, youtube block etc.

All though I’m generally against this form of pedantry, unless the target is being a humongous bell-end and deserves it, I’m going to have to agree with you, you are indeed correct and I think it’s part of the English language that’s evolving before our eyes, like the were/was issue “like you was saying” for example.

I’m not going to judge the right or wrongs of it as there are compelling arguments to both sides, what I will argue, though, is the use of the word exactly. I’m finding it a bit frustrating as it’s a absolute term that’s being used figuratively. Granted it’s virtually the same design, but not exactly the same design.

Very refreshing to not have a Force Awakens spoiler to deliberate over reading or not.

What was the point of the exercise?

Well I never did, i’ll store that one in my long term memory banks to be wheeled out each christmas when the conversation is deflating after lunch, thank-you!

That is a majestic even number over 12, regal in its simple beauty, further enlightened in its appeal by being divisible by 3, excellent choice F335, a true treat for a Wednesday afternoon if ever I saw one.

LOL, well Phasin8ing didnt get back to me, so we’ll never know any of them, though today i’m more in an Even mood than an Odd one.

Patience, lets not get too carried away here, all things in good time. Once I have 5&7 I’ll gladly move on to 11 and may even consider the technicality of whether 13 is allowed today or not.

Agreed, I say give Gustin and Amell a shot at the big screen or don't do it at all.

OK, okay, i wanted to ask about one and two, but instead I’ll kowtow to your energetic demand, but I will ask you this, what are number 5 & 7??

You can’t trust the social media net-sites man, I tell you, they’re after your neural energy, all these hand held devices suck the thought-waves right out of you, it’s a proven fact. If you don’t believe me look at peoples eyes, the more they use these mind-hack devices, the more ripley the iris’s get. i never use…

Don’t let the other make you feel Gull-ty about what you’ve done here today, I Approve this action and couldnt Duck out of my duty to support you, these nay-sayers are clearly Mallard-justed to the way we roll here on Sploid!

Yeah, I can imagine it being very good on TV, it’s a shame they lost the unique charm of the book in the film.

I could imagine it working as s trilogy I guess, with the set up and 2 interviews in the first, 3 or 4 interviews in the second then the climax in the 3rd, but one of the things that captivated me about the book was how the stories jumped around the timeline to tell the overall picture, hats off to Bradders if he did…

I’m not sure you could do it properly in film, it’d have to be at least 6 films if not more, maybe a series on TV would have done it. I was quite angry at first when I saw the film, but on a second viewing and with purposefully forgetting that it was supposed to be WWZ, it wasn’t too bad of a film.