sparent1
sparent1
sparent1

I’m hoping they dig deeper into the cult and effectively show how cult leaders are able to manipulate and gain the trust of their followers, unlike this past season of AHS which was a little more “woah cults sure are crazy!” The cult theme works a lot more if the leader and members are more realistic and human, not

I’ve actually never really played a Far Cry game, outside of the hour or so I spent with FC3, so I’m very interested in this game. Plus I’m a sucker for the cultist storyline.

Sounds good...although I still haven’t watched The Room. Gotta add that to my watchlist

Sounds like a game that would be a blast if you have a group of friends to play with; however I feel like the full retail price is going to hurt the size of the community. When you have free to play games (or just cheaper games) like Fortnite available, where friends can play together for countless hours without ever

Honestly, yeah lol. Sounds like it would be worth the read just to see how absolutely bat-shit crazy and out of character things get.

I don’t think anyone is calling it a masterpiece and if they are it’s more tongue in cheek.

Reading your comment, as well as a few others, is making me realize just how bad/dumb some of those Snyder movies are. Havent watched MoS in awhile so I forget, or just never noticed, some of those poor qualities and inconsistencies.

I’d be into that. Currently playing Evil Within 2 and I like how they opened the game up but also maintained some of the lineararity and tight quarters (which helps for tension) of the first game. Not complete open world but also not completely linear.

Difficult question to answer for a number of reasons. For one, not quite sure what you mean by “glorified side scroller with great set pieces.” Are you implying that that’s what the previous games in the series were? If so this game is going to be different. However very little has been shown and played which also

I would think most people would agree there are exceptions to the “it’s everyone’s right.” Is anyone going to argue that we should legally allow individuals with mental health issues to own a gun? Or criminals released from prison? How about a legally blind person?

“ I can’t for the life of me understand why it is people are so hung up on gun control being the big solution.”

Seems more like assumption than common sense. I get your argument. What happened during prohibition proves your point. I still think stricter regulations, such as required background checks, can help. Not just for determining what people are or are not fit for owning guns, though that is part of it, but we can also

“Any attempt at altering the second amendment, or infringing on a persons rights to purchase a firearm will be seen as violating the constitution.”

Is there any evidence to support that increasing restrictions on guns also increases gun violence or has no effect on gun violence/violence in general? The laws at the moment don’t seem to be working. People are still acquiring guns both legally and illegally. Let’s at least see what happens with stricter laws. If

I think it will deter a number of individuals from getting a gun. If you can get a gun license/permit then obtaining a gun is easy from there. If you can’t get a licence/permit a lot more effort is required. That alone will be enough to prevent some, not all, people from attempting to get a gun. It would also allow

Gun control doesn’t have to mean “take all guns away, no one’s allowed to own guns.” Anyone who wants or thinks this it is a realistic option doesn’t understand reality. But what is possible and shouldn’t be all that difficult to implement is stricter laws on obtaining gun licenses and permits. Some states are far too

Why are you so against the idea of making it more difficult to legally own a gun? If you are a law abiding citizen with nothing sketchy on your record it shouldn’t effect you one bit. You should still be able to aquire guns legally. You won’t have to worry the amount of effort or money required to get it done. Not to

“Thisis why if the will of the people is truly to (further) restrict (or eliminate) the right of the american citizen to keep and bear arms...”

Why not all of the above? Gun laws vary on a state to state level and there is no denying that some states could use stricter laws.

I can’t sit through an episode so I hate-read reviews about the show to see if I’m justified for not watching the show. It’s been about 2-3 seasons since I stopped watching and besides some Negan centric scenes and episodes* I haven’t heard or read anything that’s made me regret my decision.