sparent1
sparent1
sparent1

I’m a Pat’s fan so I understand I’m looking at this from a bias stand point but I don’t understand why fans around the league hate Patriots’ fans so much when there are fan bases like the Eagles fans and Bills Mafia. At worst the Pats’ fans are verbally obnoxious. Their teams wins and the fans expect everyone to bow

As a Pat’s fan, this is why I don’t understand the hate the fanbase receives. From that first superbowl victory in 2002 up until yesterday’s win the fan base has never “celebrated” like this. Pat’s fans can be cocky and obnoxious but the extent of it is typically “we’re the best, Brady’s the best, Belichick’s the best

WeFirst off this is extremely late response. Sorry. I just looked at my notifications for the first time since last month.

First off, one look at her Instagram name is enough to tell me what type of person she is. Clearly she is a moral, self respecting citizen that will provide positive contributions to society.

Probably not the best way to market having a trans character in the game but why jump to conclusions based on a short trailer? We don’t know if the character was being predatory or not. We don’t know the full extent of the reaction other than a shocked expression, which I think would be fairly accurate. A shocked

Maybe I’m the asshole but I would expect most heterosexual males to have a similar type of reaction. I can’t imagine there’s many straight men out there that would have no reaction to taking a girl home and finding out she has a penis. Hell I have a reaction if I order food or a drink and it’s not what I was expecting.

Im kind of confused as to what the controversy is. Im sorry if this sounds offensive but I would expect most heterosexual males to have a shocked reaction if they took a girl home, had some type of sexual interactions, and then found out she has a penis. A shocked expression is actual a mild reaction compared to how

I’d say it depends on the type of trolling. There’s trolling to be funny and there is trolling to be an asshole. In this particular situation it’s kind of funny, especially some of the pics. It’s a light hearted troll that shouldn’t be taken serious and isn’t offending anyone. At first you might think Dumas is just

Yes but PS Now can use an upgrade. The Xbox Game Pass seems better in comparison, at least on paper (haven’t used either so I cant judge from experience). PS Now has a bigger library of games but it’s also more expensive ($10 more a month) and only allows you to stream games versus being able to download them, like

“He also bragged to the reporter that everyone in track and field was doping.”

I don’t expect any improvements to be made at this point in the PS4 life cycle but next gen Sony should look into a more refined and affordable game streamimg service. Xbox’s Game Pass service sounds far better than anything Sony currently offers. If I were Sony, for next gen I’d aim for a streaming/download service

“It’s a bad rule, but they should all know how it works after Calvin Johnson and Dez Bryant”

Thought they were going to call this incomplete as well. I guess the difference is the whole “turning up field/making a football play” which can’t really be determined in the James play. What surprised me about the Packers play is that usually refs air on the side of incomplete when the ball gets knocked out while the

Likewise for the reversal of goaline touchdowns where they determine players are actually down an eyelash before the goaline. I understand that refs are getting the call right by the book but it’s a bit too detail oriented to me. If you need to go frame by frame and zoom in to determine a player short by inches

Yeah but that could be said about countless plays since replay was introduced. Thats the whole point of video replay.

Fumble and incomplete pass are two different things. The ground can’t cause a fumble if it is determine that the ball carrier established possession prior to hitting the ground. In this case, and similar instances like it (Dez Bryant catch/non-catch, Calvin Johsnon catch/ non-catch), the referees are ruling that the

I’ll admit up front that I’m a Pat’s fan but based on the rule and how it’s been interpreted over the years I’m not surprised the catch was reversed. We have seen catches like this reversed before and it always comes down to either “surviving the ground” or “establishing/maintaining possession.” It seems like if there

“ wait on replay to break it down frame-by-frame to see if it slightly jiggled.”

I could be in the minority but the more replays I see the less controversial this call looks. I understand the backlash and criticism about the call but with the way the rule is written and how they have been interpreting the rule over the years this isn’t too shocking. They have been stressing “survive the ground”

I understand that but what doesn’t makes sense to me is that citizens have no voice on this issue, which the majority of people seem to be against. Citizens should have an actual voice and say in these decisions not just voting for people that we pretend have our best interests in mind. We should be able to vote on