A lot of debate over the consequences of DV replacing film and no one ever mentioned it'd mean James Franco would release a new college lit adaptation every six weeks.

Spent my youth contemplating the nature of romantic love, as a one will do. What is it? Is it a lie? Is it ephemeral? How will I know when I've experienced it? At last I have an answer.

"You know what party I want to be invited to? The one populated entirely by people who love superhero movies and type cranky comments into message boards if someone doesn't share their opinion of The Avengers."

As someone who hasn't seen the movie and is ignorant of the universe of the comic books (hold for your applause) I don't get it. Was Marvel insisting on shirtless Hemsworth or on foreshadowing Whosafudge using the Thingamajig in Avengers 4?

This is the way the world ends. This is the way the world ends. This is the way the world ends. Not with a bang but with successive generations of Jesse Plemonses, each with less distinctive faces.

Their temporary defeat of It as children could serve as a break point with the tease of a return. Giving each timeline its own movie and this casting don't make sense now as choices but Fukunaga's earned enough trust from me as a viewer that I'm willing to be open-minded.

If a horrorcore fan who mistakes "your" for "you're" is the manifestation of your worst fear you're sheltered and uptight but I wouldn't say you're wholly irrational.

There are only so many per year willing to have any memorable features sandblasted off their faces who are also affectless and YA adaptations already snatch up most of them. Have to work with the pool you're given.

Yeah, I'd like to be able to bring him up in ten years without someone saying "Aw, dude, I can't think of him as anyone except that clown." I'd also like to have conversations in ten years with people who don't start sentences with "Aw, dude," but that's a lower priority than shared respect for Ben Mendelsohn's…

Straight from the Stephen King Wiki: "Because King didn't wish this to be viewed as a lewd scene, the narrative explicitly states that the act of intimacy with each of the boys helps to further strengthen their friendship; and Beverly only experiences orgasm while having intercourse with Bill Denbrough and Ben…

Has there ever been another scene from a novel where there was as much of a guarantee that it will NEVER be included in a filmed adaptation?

So he's Henry Bowers in your adaptation?

"*runs off naked through the forest*"
"(shows up years later with a crazy-man beard, ranting about how Christ has abandoned us)"

"Before I part with this bag of gold, good smith, I must ask: how is the junk access?"

Any hetero man might reconsider his orientation after his wife cheats on him with his best friend and his sister tricks him into impregnating her with a son who grows up to be his greatest enemy.

GET HYPED, PEOPLE! CARS AND GUNS AND OPEN TERRAIN! WARPAINT AND FLAMETHROWING GUITARS! TRUE TO LIFE DEPICTIONS OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF SEXUAL ABUSE! MAY 15TH!

Cheers on bringing to mind one of the worst implications of the response "Two men enter, one man leaves."

Yeah, or they liked the actress so much they decided to ignore it and weren't comfortable asking a child to dye her hair for a TV show. The show is largely actor-driven, not driven so much by the logic of Martin's world or theirs. They respect their performers' schedules, give them more to work with if possible, don't…

This is why Pete was smiling ear to ear. He always wanted to be Don. Compared to Ferg he IS Don. He's finally the cool one in the office.

It was 1970 at SC&P but it's still 1960 at McCann. The run of the show (and some vermouth) prepared Peggy to live in Season 7 while Joan watched herself get trapped back in Season 1.