spammo15
spammo15
spammo15

Yes, the ADIZ is just that: 'air defense identification zone'. It is still international airspace. Most countries do have an ADIZ. We intercept aircraft in the ADIZ if they haven't identified themselves, but it's legal for foreign aircraft to fly in and we do it all the time in Chinese and Russian ADIZ's.

You really think "Putins Russia" is the more aggressive party here? You should read a little more into what is actually going on. We are picking a fight with them not the other way around.

US air defense identification zone DOES NOT MEAN US AIRSPACE. THESE PLANES WERE NOT IN US AIRSPACE. stop getting your news from the washington times.

"Russian bombers have penetrated US airspace 16 times in the last TEN days."

"....Russian bombers have penetrated US airspace 16 times in the last TEN days...."

Very good point that the 'fear-mongering' being screamed in this article was very disappointing. People need to not worry about such enemy nuke systems as they are actually pretty irrelevant in the final analysis. (... if being compared against the true existing power projected by coordinated global diplomacy,

All China and Russia would have to do is announce they're going to stop accepting dollars for what they produce and manufacture and the U.S would lose its reserve currency status and the economy would crash overnight. The U.S government couldn't finance the military if they didn't have other countries to pay for it by

United States Space Program has 3 times more fatalities than the Russian space program, something like 22 vs. 7

Clearly you have not studied your history well. Lets not forget who sends all those cosmonauts and astronauts to space.

Um, Soyuz?

I actually agree on this. I understand that this is on a sub-blog but it's promoted on the full jalopnik front page with a photo lead-in visible just like any other normal jalopnik article. If this were put on the left hand side under the "Trending on Related Blogs" ticker I could accept it happily. But it's like

Then let it stand on its own and dont push it out on Jalopnik. Why not feature these stories on Jezebel? Lifehacker? Kotaku? They're every bit as relevant to this post as Jalopnik.

You know, I think stuff like this is interesting, but I can't understand why machines of war show up on Jalopnik. Jalopnik is a site devoted to cars, the fun of owning them, looking at them, racing them, fixing them, etc. Its a site that brings joy and information.

Why Jalopnik thinks its ok to highlight posts talking

"Edmunds had a lot of problems with their long-term volt"

Here's a list of the problems my parents' 2007 Audi A8L has had in 8 years of ownership.

Tesla and Musk have done a great job whipping nerds into a froth with their marketing, but the product itself isnt very good. But, like Google before it, theyve managed to get a bunch of people parroting their marketing all over the internet. Its pretty impressive.

I've got a 2013 Audi S5, I'm about two months from a year and a half of ownership with no issues. The Tesla is the same money and died roadside three times, that alone is completely unacceptable.

I have had high-end German cars all my life and never had a list that long of shit that had to be fixed or replaced in a single car ever, I doubt anyone has...in any car.

The car was a goddamn lemon. I still can't believe some moron paid them $83,000 for an almost 2 year old lemon with 30,000 miles on it. Unbelievable.

  • "Yesterday I put my 5-year-old in the Tesla's rear jump seat. It was met with a mixed review. There was a moment of hesitation, for both of us, when I closed the hatch. Then, as I climbed in the driver seat to take her for a ride, she said this. 'Daddy, I don't think it's a good idea to put kids in the