It can be two disappearing sitcom characters.

The Newswire about it from last night said she's reprising a character she played in season one.

Chuck died on the way back to Mork's home planet.

Chuck Cunningham. She's going to go upstairs in the season finale and vanish from existence.

Kevin Can Have A Never-Ending Chain of Hot Wives

The premise (in the pilot, anyway) was that he's a retired cop, so I don't think so.

And that was the same character played by different actresses; this seems to be a full-on replacement.

Oh my god, they're really doing it!

This whole comment section is like a game of "Spot Who's Never Been Called A Slur Before!"

True. Sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do to flip depression the bird.

Imaginary Child Services.

You're not entirely wrong, but the problem is that separation and assumed (moral, intellectual, physical, spiritual) superiority has existed for centuries and led to some pretty horrific shit, and that negative perception of disabled people is pretty firmly entrenched in society to this day. It really doesn't need to…

I really don't think I'm using any language that's out of the ordinary, but if you disagree I'd be happy to define specific terms.

I get the point he's trying to make here, but I really don't think he needs to play into the idea of there being decisions so objectively terrible that only disabled people can't see that. It's a negative stereotype that holds that non-disabled people are superior, and it's not at all the way he should have phrased it.

First of all, there's a difference between intellectual disability and mental illness. Secondly, I've never approved of that tactic myself and really wish people would knock it off. Thirdly, it is definitely possible for someone under either category to make decisions for themselves; it's pretty reductive to assume…

Well, I'm certainly weird and possibly an outlier, but the rest of it was true.

Before that, since he sold it to Peter Frampton at a garage sale first.

You can tell your friend that you have the express permission of a real-life developmentally-disabled person (ie, me) to say "idiot".

The problem is that he shouldn't be associating intellectually disabled people with offensive or unethical behaviour in the first place. It contributes to the narrative that disabled people can't be trusted or can't do anything "correctly", and that only disabled people could possibly make such bad decisions (instead…

I thought there was a chance it was different in the British version or something.