space-madness
Space Madness
space-madness

There is nothing in the world that can’t or shouldn’t be critiqued no matter where it came from or how old it is. Old things, especially, need to be reexamined when they are highly revered because often they are imitated. This problem with Star Wars is the same problem with indie game makers who worship 8-bit games

Saying “Leia should be good enough” is extremely dismissive. Star Wars is not two guys and a girl. There’s Luke, Han, Chewie, 3p0, R2 (I know the lesbian jokes, but R2 is called a “he” multiple times), Obiwan, Lando, Vader, Tarkin, Boba Fett, Jabba the Hut, the Emperor. That’s actually a 1:12 ratio, not 1:2. It sounds

This argument astounds me. You don’t think women weren’t watching? That’s wrong. And even if that what producers thought was the case for the first film what about the other two after the audience numbers came in? 1977? This is over ten years after second wave feminism told hold. Exact at what point in history do we

LOL. What about that second picture looks more “Asian” to you?

I know nothing of this show. However, this random sampling of screen shots all show one point perspective and people looking straight at the camera which says “low quality crap” to me.

I don’t know why people want a post TNG series so badly. Trek is too loaded to baggage - a lot of it mediocre - for any sane person to want a new show to adhere to it. Dominion Wars? Borg wimpification? Nemesis? Enterprise? Why would you want to even remember those things? Trek 2009 should have been a complete reboot.

The gun is good. The penis is evil.

I've seen these on the street in San Francisco. They aren't that impressive. Kind of dim and, since they're lighting the inside of the wheels, not very visible from the front or back. Honestly, head and back lights plus wheel lights would be cheaper and more effective.

Except that everything that’s true and matters was looked over by someone with no bias - which is what I've based my opinion on, not the prosecution. So your entire argument falls to shit.

I could easily see links treated like attachments a la Facebook and mentions and hashtags treated as tags. Also remember as you are complaining that Twitter is on life support and has plateaued as far as new sign ups. What made them initially popular is not making them successful.

“Unbiased and factual are two entirely separate concepts.”

I have to ask: How is 3D touch so different than a press and hold (like the kind that turns on icon arrangement in io8 and below)? It seems like you still have to hold your finger there to activate it. Does that really require a new hardware set?

“I think your bias might be showing a little”

I’ll say this for the third time. Undisclosed is a work of total fan wankery by people determined to get a specific outcome - Adnan’s innocence. There isn’t a reputable review of the show that doesn’t agree.

Beware. That podcast is run by people who have a person stake in Adnan’s innocence. Its hardly unbiased or factual.

I don’t think anything you’ve said has been refuted. It all comes from a competing podcast run by Adnan’s crazy relative and her lawyer friends who have an expressed desire to show Adnan is innocent, not to find the truth. If a judge or jury buys all that crap I’ll pay more attention, but right now I agree with every

I think the lawyer did the best she could. The only mistake was the Asia defense, and I have a feeling those letters are BS. She sounds like she’s trying to insert herself into something in them.

I’m totally ok with him serving time.

Just want to get in real quickly that Adnan did that shit.

I understand that, but I’m talking about two conversation specific examples. One of which is in a low budget comedy.