That’s because the design is from the sixties.

Before anyone starts with the E39 started in the 90s crap, keep in mind the M5 didn’t start (EDIT: US) production until 2000.

Most timeless? I mean, duh!

Those same men are on record as saying that the constitution should be torn up and rewritten frequently.

Stop. I’m not a gun advocate, but this is the type of response that shuts down any type of discussion just as fast as “BUT IT’S IN THE CONSTITUTION”.

Nice list but I prefer my combination

OR

FOR THE RECORD: Raphael Orlove definitely disagreed with me on this point earlier today.

It’s a close-ratio news gearbox.

This is the full beans, actually

I totally would want my truck with that 5.3L V6...

You *always* hate blanket statement?

A 70’s Lincoln Mark IV because Spec Land Yacht needs to happen in my life. That, and cruising downtown in this thing would be such a good conversation starter.

1986 Monte Carlo SS.

Yes, seriously stop saying this until you understand how a balance sheet works. The cars have a healthy profit margin. The company is showing losses due to R&D and expansion. Divide those losses by cars sold and you get a cool number to generate clicks with.

Nah, MJF not ODB

That’s just the Mazda weight reduction kit.

“Great Moments in Pisstory,” clearly.

“Losing” 4000 bucks on each car doesn’t mean they actually lose 4000 bucks on cost vs retail price. Actually their margins, seemed to be pretty healthy. I haven’t studied the numbers, but if I had to guess, that 4000 loss refers to their total revenues minus expenditures, divided by number of cars sold in the last…

yeah actually a 4matic gas wagon is preferable in this case because everyone can work on one and frankly this thing is a POS, you’re overpaying for the “privilege” of driving something unique and way under powered (90hp?!?!?) with no f-in A/C (black car no less) to fulfill your desire for diesel and a stick, to be…