southcbishop
southcbishop
southcbishop

Perhaps (and this is just an assumption really) China is going through similar cultural questioning now that they are opening up a bit to the western world. Maybe there is also a large portion of the Chinese populous who wants to see more diversity in their films? Sure, they are used to seeing all white people in the

Point of contention... Tom Cruise didnt actually save anyone in The Last Samurai. (Spoiler Alert)... they all die and fail miserably :)

Well. Regulated. Militia.

Hopefully, WB sees this and says, “Well, I guess a Lobo movie could work”.

Yeah, but proper containment has nothing to do with the massive stream of energy that’s being sucked into to hole. It may be a strong “tractor beam” or whatever, but that zero energy would escape that stream of super heated star juice that none of the snow surrounding the hole would be liquified? Let alone the life

I agree, to some degree. I think they could have used another mechanism to destroy the entire senate. Hell, they could have just said that had been done before the movie’s events happened. But I don't think it matters that much in the end. My bigger complaint is that it was sucking up the energy of a star AND THE SNOW

SPOILLLLERRRRSSSSSS!!!!

Couple of points: the explosion “in to” space would be here on earth. Also: explosions are possible in space. The force of the chemical/mechanical reaction would still exist, and it temporarily could be stronger than the forces of the vacuum of space. The fire involved would be extremely short lived as the only fuel

Strangely, Id argue that the best example of Sandler’s art involves him getting punched in the face by drunk love :)

I get that. It can be exasperating following this stuff sometimes. But as I actually enjoy keeping abreast of the news (I know, I’m a bit of a masochist), I’ve come to see something: Most of the bias is actually within the readers. Though I’m not trying to say that certain outlets don’t sway to a particular side of

Also. I might add: I am not a server. I’m a college graduate who has been working in my field for over ten years now. However, I’m not entirely sure what your intention is in your reply. Are you trying to say that someone who works in the service industry can’t be intelligent or use logic? That seems like the kind of

Did you mean to respond to me? I’m not sure if you did, because I’m failing to see any melodrama in my post. Nor is anything I mentioned part of a one-man “argument” that only I can hear within an echo-chamber. And though the facts surrounding GamerGate absolutely have relevance to women’s issues, I don’t see where I

Not exactly. If a string is wound on top of itself, the thickness of the string would affect the length between tangent A and tangent B (which would both occupy the same origin and direction in this case) therefore each “wind of the string” would be a minute, but asymmetrical length.

And I’d also argue that you are fudging the timeline. The “Quinspiracy” is what started this whole thing. The very original complaint was an act of slut-shaming from the get go. If that wasn’t true, there would have been an equal amount of vitriol towards all parties involved. But that's not what happened is it?

I’d argue that Anonymous is also a group. When a collection of people all point at a name and say, “this is a thing we are part of”, it inherently becomes a group.

SJW isnt an actual group. Its a derogative acronym standing for social justice warrior, given to anyone that dares to claim that minorities should have equal footing in our society by those who see it as less of a “lifting the minorities” up thing, and more of a “dragging the majority down” thing.

If you’ve got a logo, you’re a group. Just because the message isn’t cohesive, that doesn’t mean that the people spouting the incohesive message under the same banner don’t constitute a collective.

I think you may be confusing attraction with sexuality. But even in that sense, you are only choosing the individual with the traits you are naturally attracted to. It may be the case that you choose the individual even in the face of not aligning with that persons traits. But the choice is in the individual, not the

Fine with me. I don’t play online multiplayer at all for this very reason. And I know I am not alone. And truthfully any decision that might push people back towards couch co-op is a good thing.

Many people DO get it. The problem with the electoral college is that each state dictates its own rules as to how the votes are tallied and cast. I don't think many people have a problem with a system to help balance the voices of the entire population. The problem comes from the inconsistencies that come from not