If you saw how overbuilt ATM’s are, you’d know this was a futile attempt even if they had doubled their speed.

It’s all fun and games until you realize they weren't using their own wallet to pay for it all!

You know, england had that idea once. They locked up everyone bad and annoying, and Australia was born.

And insurance pays MSRP.

Not much worse than anyone else though if we're being honest.

Whenever i get really bored on car stuff, i look up full size truck accessories.  Never have i seen so many add-on ladders...

Fully paid healthcare is a double edged sword.

Now i want to know if the truck or the owner is broken...

what a ground breaking idea!

Welcome to unions. It’s always fun when some dickhead pulls up on a straightpiped hardley onto my jobsites and starts carding people.

I don't believe in blind support of anything.  

Stupid question. Why does GM need the UAW?  The UAW obviously needs GM to employ the people within itself, but what benefit does the UAW give back making all the hassle worth it?

my intention was to highlight the choices GM made to get into that position, and how i feel the union is pushing them back into exactly that same position. “learning from history” and all. i feel that GM under Mary has been working to turn things around and be a better company than it was before the bailout. it just…

so we bailed gm out once due to all the jerbs they support. at what point does asking forcing gm for more more more kill them again? is that a net benefit?

a mirror camera should be mounted solidly to the side of the vehicle.  if it needs image stabilization, whoever designed the side pod mounting assembly should be fired.

nothing says future like a heavily compressed gas held in a tank from the lowest bidder!!

am i also a poseur for carrying a pocket knife all the time?

why’d you click? if you didn’t click, it would be a vote within the metrics to create less drifting content.

as far as i’m aware, camera image sensors are square or round. so no matter the situation here, they’re clipping away parts of the image to fit into a very odd shape.

BUT, BUT TO DO IT BETTER WILL COST $2500 MORE!!  (on a $1.5 million project)....