Exactly! And what publisher is going to sell a single player game with DRM to someone who can't activate staid DRM?
Souls
souls
No, see without an internet connection it's impossible to use DRM on singleplayer games, unless you purposely want to sell them a game they can't play. With Microsoft's console publishers can assume that people who own one will be connected to the internet, thanks to it's requirements, but there's no such requirement…
As has been said already, the highest score doesn't exactly mean perfect. Adam Sessler, for instance, considers his 5 out of 5 scores as a recommendation for everyone to at least try it. It may or may not be perfect, but it's a damn fine game that people should try their best to get a taste of.
Xbox One requires an internet connection. The PS4 doesn't.
Harry also dies.
It's not gone, but it's been butchered. Which is the point.
One of the greatest things about consoles has been their ease of sharing games and playing together with friends. This is perfectly acceptable behavior, consumers are fighting for something that meant a lot to these platforms, and they'll keep fighting so long as they can.
No, but there's a significant difference between the two, and one doesn't affect singleplayer games. Games like The Last of Us, Bioshock, Metro, The Walking Dead, Far Cry 3, and Guacamelee, among others.
Syncing could also be used to describe the process of reconnecting, which is the context Microsoft gives us in their description of "Low Power State". A description which is included in the article actually.
Blame Microsoft for using that term, not Evan for "not being clear". Read the article and the description for Low Power State.
Well, that's Call of Duty. As much as this game tries to act like it's Call of Duty, it isn't, and I don't think you'll ever find a player in CoD or Arma who also play this.
So... you realize that they don't share an audience in the slightest?
This is a mobile game...
I don't see that. What I see is a minor annoyance being abolished, minor annoyances are an annoyance just like many things in life, this isn't one of those big ones. This is so minor that this is the only article that this feature's been mentioned on, and it'll probably stay that way - bar round-up posts - for quite a…
You know, this isn't life-changing, and nobody said it was. What's your point?
It's a minor thing, people put up with it but if it could fixed then that's good. Consumers expect more from better technology, that's how it's been forever.
Read my response to BoxSauce, this is more or less a minor annoyance that's now gone.
No, see when you watch a movie or TV show you'll want to turn the controller back on after it's over with, and now with this controller it's basically instantaneous. Revolutionary? Not at all, it's just a minor annoyance that's now gone.
Does the 360 have a power-saving feature were the controller shuts off after a moment of inactivity? If so, then this is for people who use that, which could be a lot.
I was expecting a sex joke, but was pleasantly surprised.