Well Nintendo have a lot of money. I mean A LOT. They can buy anyone except the big fishes, but wont buy anyone. BecauseNintendo.
Well Nintendo have a lot of money. I mean A LOT. They can buy anyone except the big fishes, but wont buy anyone. BecauseNintendo.
That was a bit fanboyish but I agree totally.
I d give you 10 stars if I could. :-)
Good job avoiding the question, I ll try try remember this trick, may need it someday. Have a nice weekend too. :-)
Hey, you majored, meaning you’re older than 15. It’s a shock given your behavior. Also, give me the dates of Charlemagne, and the start of the HRE?
Do you even know the HRE doesn’t even include the Franc territory? Easy check: Google image Charlemagne empire and the HRE...
It’s true they were a bit less faithful to their promises than the others but I feel they delivered better exclusives than Microsoft. You can’t beat Nintendo on exclusives but Sony had a solid year unless you only have a vita.
1. Yannick thank you for writing so much articles about HotS, we really enjoy it.
Guy or not, the Internet is full of people like you. You ll argue for hours because you cannot be wrong, it d hurt you so much. Also, you have to be disrespectfull to the other guy because, you know, Internet. Again, you’rewrong with both 1 & 2you but I dont plan on discussing forever with a wall. For 1 please read a…
It s funny the idiot was able to admit a mistake but the clever guy cannot, because his world would fall appart if he admitted he made some mistake. Fortunately I m the idiot.
What a waste of time! :D
Well you know, people played Jesus, God, Buddha, kings, emperors, prophets... There’s no such thing as a big shoe to fill for the movie industry. A movie about his life would be great though.
Emperor Charlemagne is by no means roman, but Franc (old French to make it simple). The roman empire was anything but holy so I don’t know if it’s the official name in the U.S. but if it’s the case you’ve been taught bullshit. Sorry to be that guy but it had to be said.
Because? Who decided that except your fanboyism? They removed coop because it would have took them longer to release the game and they don’t want to delay. Period.
So, a game that is yet to be released is the most beautiful console FPS of all time because it doesn’t have coop. Yup I don’t know what I’m talking about. Eh. You’re funny. :D
Hey, all of this sounds like lazy excuses. If I had the time I could name you at least 50 great games with gorgeous visuals and a local coop. Which sometimes looks really bad, but who cares you’re playing with real people and are having so much fun.
That’s an example. A lot of games cut on the visuals to allow coop. I’m ok with that and a lot of people are, because in local coop fun is the most important thing. It can be frame rate, textures or anything.
Yup, and the 60fps argument is dumb. I’d rather play split screen coop in 30 fps than not at all...
Thank you! I’m really bored with those female link discussions.
That made my day. I love you Internet. :-)
Localization means more sales so you shouldn’t take it into account. Being a port is the same. There are development costs but way more incomes. Why would it make the game more expensive or more valuable? In the contrary it allows them to grab more cash, and it’s a good thing both for them and for us.