First off they never gave the names at all. It was just the symbols. Second If you want to get technically Wonder Woman picture was over 100 years old. You mean to tell me her name wouldn't go down in history, even if it was a covered top secrete?
First off they never gave the names at all. It was just the symbols. Second If you want to get technically Wonder Woman picture was over 100 years old. You mean to tell me her name wouldn't go down in history, even if it was a covered top secrete?
As are you. Who is to say you yourself are. Ah questions and questions to ever flow.
Isn't that what it mostly comes down to no? Isn't it all a matter of opinion then fact? I am telling the way and few others think about the film. Do we all not have a right to share our thoughts and debate? SO in your term people that will disagree with others because a so called majority say so when the majority said…
I did yet you failed to grasp what i said. I replied with it is stupid to even think of such things in that way for it was not used to be meaningless. It was spot on. They showed bruce having that martha connection and that embodiment of his second chance in life.
I did just answer. I gave you my thought on it and how both parents did have the same name. to say if it was a different name is STUPID because that was there names since the BEGGING. This goes back even to the characters origins so again it isn't stupid that they both have the same name for that was there names to…
It does. You personally do not yet many question the scenes, and want answers. If you just assume it is bad or good then what of it? Give your stance upon it, and yet know that when you do be prepared to give evidence or speculations that would fall into that category. I believe this film has it and does well at it,…
This is one of those movies. Who are you to say it isn't? Do we let bandwagon get in the way, and many other things that can hinder it? For i mean in this day in age people bandwagon a LOT. Considering if you take a look at the presidential race.
1. To be fair technically yes. In the Prequel comics for the movie he already knew. However even without it, the bases is that lex had resources upon the matter. If bruce and clark by just talking for a few minutes knew who they were, then i am sure the man that sets all that up can identify them. Also It is clear…
As many would agree with me? Just like anyone's word is opinion right? Critics words are opinions are they not? they are not fact for there are times fans do consider what they believe is fact as are all in most cases. If i come out that way i mean no disrespect just showing how things can be made sense of if you put…
And that's just it. Right there. Early on people would explain this. However when people do it for Batman v Superman they can't for others point this out yet when someone like me does it then becomes a "no you can't for it is bad" yet i did explain it yet people hand wave it or just say it is bad regardless even…
I do believe the man in the building scene was a bit tacky and why would people stand around in the building while this is going on. However after that scene the man does show he was wondering around the building making sure everyone got out that he can find. It was just on the same floor he was on.
desperate? Is that what people call when trying to debate a case? If so then humanity has clearly fallen off debating term wise. I posted comments to share thoughts upon things that didn't make sense for a majority and really need to stop and look at the film and think about it.
Right just like the ending of the First Avengers movie right. the A so happened to have survived the damage. get it it is an Avengers movie/Future tower.
However they DO. That is the point. Nobody ever really payed that much attention to it yet they did have the same name. It way to tie it all together and why Bruce is having dreams about his mothers grave. Snyder and Chris wanted to play something more to Bruce's parents deaths and it plays off.
And Batman v Superman is surrounded by that. however the critics went the other way instead and a good portion of the audience. It is a movie that is very underrated and that sucks. It does offer a lot and i have been explaining it all to well yet the thing is people don't want to argue and want to agree to disagree.…
Considering how loads of money and tech go to Bruce Wayne's researches that so happen to have batman using them…..I'm pretty sure it would be obvious on Bruce's part. Not to mention if Lois could figure out Superman's identity and Lex being the Smartest man on the planet couldn't……then is he really the smartest person…
Just like if you didn't see the movie other than taking things from one view and no doing critical thinking. Doesn't become hypocritical in what you say when it can be said vise versa.
Because she pulled the part off just right. Wonder Woman doesn't have to be Big in breast or body size. If you look at the comics she really is slim with some muscle yet not rugby type or big cannons.
sigh* i liked Zootopia. I am just saying it has flaws yet so did batman v superman yet the critics were very hard on the film yet it really didn't have many issues other than editing and some scenes that made little scenes.
YET isn't that what critics and audience members do to movies? Especially this one? Also yeah just like every other movie does yet Batman v Superman wasn't that bad it was actually simple to understand. Problem is the scenes that really get people are the "what if" future scene, why didn't clark go looking for his…