sonofkalas2
SonofKalas2
sonofkalas2

Kotaku will write about ANYTHING if there is a way for them to turn it into a racial issue

lol

More proof that you guys will make anything a racial issue.

sure, have a nice day.

Deductive reasoning is not “Nitpickey” I never said your conclusion was wrong, either. You’ve taken my post in the exact wrong way.

I did ask you what differentiated the two cases insofar as your line of reasoning is concerned. None of this changes the line of reasoning (It affect a racial group predominantly therefore it must be racist)

How so? Also, It doesn’t need to be, It is not a defense of trump, but a response to your position that predominantly affecting an ethnic group alone is enough to make something racist.

You have no Idea what race I am. I absolutely am.

banning people based on where they come from is not the same as banning people based on what race they are. Just because something happens to affect people of certain races more than others does not make it targeted at those races because of race.

Does he have disgusting conflicts of interest, YES. but your own response disproves that the sole criteria is that they are Muslim countries that he has no interests in.

Can we please start bring honest about the ban? If the sole deciding factor was that the countries’s were predominantly muslim, there would be 20 plus countries on that list. It is therefore evident that they were selected based on other criteria. They were chosen based on the amount of state sponsoring of terrorism

The day Nioh came out

Hi, BiS. Long time subscriber here, I’m honestly not surprised. The US one had more time to flesh things out. At least there is always Blackadder to use as an example of britcom supremacy.

You know full well how disingenuous this is Nathan Grayson, You know full well that these situations are radically different to the point of being incomparable.

Because the two situations are remotely comparable. Right?

Because people are beginning to realize that silencing these opinions accomplishes NOTHING. It only makes them STRONGER. Not hearing something doesn’t mean it’s not there, It just means it gets to fester unchecked and unchallenged in the darkness like a fungus. Silencing these people makes us FEEL safer but it doesn’t

When you can only stop an ideology with violence you have no argument. We didn’t take arms against the nazi ideology in WWII. We took ideology to ideology, and then arms to arms. Words to meet words and violence to meet violence. NEVER answer one with the other lest you lose us ground

Actually It DOES do something. It loses the left support and garners the Supremacists sympathy. It lends credence to their position in the public sphere. IT IS ACTIVELY harmful to those who serve the cause of preventing fascism from taking power. Those who cheered are those who are only interested in serving their

Yes thank you for that Idea, Causing more problems than it solves since year 0. As gratifying as it is, answering speech with violence has been shown time and time again throughout history to cause MORE problems not less. Wait for them to throw a punch and THEN fuck them up or you’re no better.

Gamer culture in and of itself is toxic