if that’s someone’s worst nightmare then they are seriously spoiled. meanwhile in the land of adults we have real issues to deal with.

That WASN’T a star of Dvid. speaking as a jew here the star of david is empty inside except for the lines. the star he used was a solid block. he is right about this, as much as it pains me to say

and of course every time us jews are mentioned, someone has to bring Israel into it as though It has any fucking thing to do with the situation at hand.

they are not the same word they are entirely different words, pronounced differently, and in different languages. therefore the word Pokemon was NOT around prior to gamefreak. there was only an entirely different word that is spelled the same

Not legaly required != not required. The company’s hands are tied when it comes to localization. And NO localization is usually done by sub-contractors not the company itself

Yes there absolutely is. The localization team is an official body. Their actions often cross the line from translation to injecting political agendas and suppressing ideas. Nowhere in the definition does it say that it needs to be legally required in order to constitute censorship.

It’s because Ghostbusters is special to him in a way other franchises are not and because things like independence day at least looked from the trailer to have at least some potential. Way to assume

There is no “my” definition. There is only the dictionary definition

I have plenty of evidence, mostly from conversations I’ve had with some of the people who have made these decisions. they do it because they are afraid that a small but vocal overly sensitive minority will raise a ruckus and smear the game in question causing a PR nightmare that will negatively impact sales. self…

it’s also disingenuous to say that its not censorship. the company is not making changes because to wants to. it’s caving in to external pressure due to necessity. this is censorship.

They do NOT have those choices. You clearly know nothing about how publishing actually works. The devs are often contractually bound to continue making games (usually at least a few) for their publisher after their first game for said publisher, and getting a publisher is the only real way to get started. Almost all…

you act like they have a choice. they do not. they must agree to seeing their creations altered to appeal to the intolerant or see them fail utterly in obscurity. this is not a choice. there are no other real options of publishers and in many cases they are contractually bound to a specific publisher. often times the…

It is often completely disconnected teams on the other side of the planet. they are involved with one another in name and legality only

I suspect China will have mandated changes to firmware on Chinese devices to remove the “allow installation from unknown sources” option. To get it back they would have to install a custom firmware, and if the bootloader is locked.... things get difficult.

You act like the people implementing the content changes are the same people who created the content to begin with. They are not.

HEY BiS. How are you doing? You should do the resident evil demo or rise of the tomb raider

“YouTube has an enormous “clickbait” problem” - a website with an enormous clickbait problem, 2016.

and yet I saw the same method being recommended as though they were comparable situations

The crucial difference is that an intoxicated person is not fully culpable for their actions. Legally speaking the bartender is culpable because he/she is fully aware while the customer is not in complete control of their faculties. You cannot say the same of the gun buyers. You are therefore comparing apples and…

Horsecrap. Name one instance