sonicreducer1
Sonic Reducer 151
sonicreducer1

Man 1998?! For reference, that was a time when the President could get impeached for a blowjob. WILD!

I never could stand NDT, and it offends me that he’s considered the heir to the throne of Carl Sagan. Sagan was a constant advocate for science and was personable and empathetic. In contrast, Tyson is a pedant that thinks he’s the science pope.

Go away... batin’.

. . . That . . . that was the joke.

Come on.

Yeah, I feel like I’m a broken record at this point, because I keep quoting Ta-Nehisi Coates’ article “Fear of a Black President” about racism. At this point, I can pretty much cite the quotation from memory:

Draymond IS this generation’s version of Bill Laimbeer. If he wasn’t a part of the Warriors, they wouldn’t have had the near the success the past 5 years, so I’ll trade the cuddly image they could have had with the killers they’ve actually been any time. Teams are open about being physical with Steph to knock him off

-Dolan is such a great musician he can indirectly create new genres of music

Sadly, if the pay is decent, I know a lot of musicians who would take it in a heartbeat.

“I like smoking weed and paying for affection, occasionally arguing pedophilia should be legal, but I’ll be DAMNED if poor people have support, minorities have rights, and women are protected!”

You realize this is that Horiwhatever Croissant Nazi fucker under a new name right? Seems like this person is trying their damn hardest to be the new tomato.

Last night, spokesperson for Justice Democrats Waleed Shahid responded on Twitter to Claire McCaskill, a former Senator who lost her race in the Midwest, who said that “free stuff from the government does not play well in the Midwest.”

Why not? It’s clear somebody ought to explain it to you as you understand it so poorly.

 You're really bad at this. 

  • to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source

    It’s right there in the list this dipshit keeps posting. LMAO

1. Good for you. Not sure what relevance that has. But good for you nonetheless.

Long Answer: Because the amount taxed does not nullify the amount procured (i.e. wealthy people are never taxed into unwealth), it breaks up monopolies of money (remember, monopolies are bad), and the redistribution of money and wealth throughout society eventually propagates back to them in the long run, after

Exactly. This is why the Cayman Islands is the world’s most successful economy. This is why Delaware is the most prosperous U.S. state.