Or they just couldn't get it done before the release. Nearly every game I have played has areas that look cool, but just were never completed and you couldn't access them.
Or they just couldn't get it done before the release. Nearly every game I have played has areas that look cool, but just were never completed and you couldn't access them.
How are you determining the level of quality?
It reminds me of the Schumer piece. This is were the poo comes out!
Yeah. The silver (reflective part is on the back of the glass), so there should be the width of the glass difference between your finger and its reflection.
I don't know. Seems like he mansplained it to everyone's satisfaction, "honey". This is a non-issue. Please move along and buy some wings.
Your post is one big idealistic "So what?"
Valve is a business - as in for profit. It is not some modder commune. They are going to do whatever puts money in their pocket. What is their real incentive to be more liberal to modders unless that sends some serious cash their way?
Greed??? Oh, you mean like coming up with the whole Skyrim idea, sinking millions into the development, going out and marketing it into one of the most successful games ever and NOW they want to get paid for their work? And they only gave 25% to the modder? Yeah, that is pretty much the business world when you want to…
Funny how people counter a fast food choice with other fast food choices. Does anyone under 35 still eat actual food made by actual people any more? Or is it all just Chipotle now with ZERO knowledge of what real Mexican, Cali-Mex, or Tex-Mex tastes like?
Oh, well, poo!
It's ok if that's all you have left to say. Your point was shit to begin with. I doubt even someone arguing honestly could do better from that position.
Ah! Now I get where you are coming from. You have poor reading comprehension. You thought you read I said all, when I clearly did not. Then you interpreted a refusal to back down from something I never said. I can see why you are so confused.
What does a renter's deduction have to do with a federal itemization??
This has nothing to do with the article nor did I see it is an either-or situation. Why are 90% of rebuttals on this site black-and-white simplifications of more complex topics?
OK - Sorry you feel that way. Please feel free to block me or you can skip my posts.
North Texas. Yeah, like $30 a week for 1/3 an acre.
Um. I really don't care.
I own a goat, so my cost is $5 a month for keeping my grass short. All other arguments are invalid because my experience is different.
Why do you dishonestly exclude the fact that "Grandma's 1972 house" is usually a tear down?
Yes. Every home goes from being new to being unlivable unless additional investments are made. Even that just extends the useful life. Eventually, the plot becomes more valuable than the house and the house kept as historic or torn down.