The NRA is the KKK, they just have a much better administrative department.
The NRA is the KKK, they just have a much better administrative department.
You mean they haven’t already?
Uh...I take it you have not researched the history of either organization? They were separated at birth, dude. They don’t openly admit it but they also conspicuously never speak ill of each other.
Yeah, well... ah... we’ve had your hockey trophy for nearly a quarter-century, so... there?
...fuck it, I have nothing, you Canucks have it made and I’m deeply jealous of you.
When the old stationary finally runs out?
Pfft, fuck no. The NRA has about as much respect for gun owners as Sen. Feinstein herself. One the sale is rung up, and their real boosters, the manufacturers, have gotten their money, they couldn’t care less about the rights of gun owners. Their particular disdain for the black community makes me feel like Colion…
It doesn’t get said enough, but open carry laws, like stand your ground laws, only apply to white people. A black guy with a gun in public is a criminal until proven otherwise, which is never.
They’re working on it. There are anti-trust issues; there’s some concern that they’d be cornering the market on racism.
At what point does the NRA just merge with the KKK?
I’m sure the NRA is all over this to support Mr. Hughes’s 2nd Amendment rights, right? RIIIIIIGGGGGHHHHTTTTT???????
15 in Canada, and no Trump! win-win
Counterpoint: if it’s raining hard enough to turn on your wipers, sure would be nice if I could also see you/your lights. I don’t think this is a stupid law at all. Lack of enforcement, perhaps, is stupid.
That seems weird. Weekends are prime selling time.
In Indiana, you can’t buy a car on a Sunday. In the same vein as how you can’t buy carry-out beer on Sunday. Because GOD. Or something.
Cars only being sold through dealerships and not directly from the manufacturer.
Yeah, but it took longer than I would have thought.
Yeah, it was incredibly dishonest.
Don’t worry, the progressives eventually came out to remind us how racist we’re being by pointing out issues that have been studied by experts for decades who have come to the same conclusions. Also, apparently the writer couldn’t be bothered to fill in 95% of Macron’s response (that she replaced with an ellipses)…
Actually, if they reported his full quote, it would have shown that 95% of his response to the question was talking about violence, corruption, etc. That ellipses that was put into his quote accounts for the vast majority of his answer. It was only one sentence where he mentioned the fertility thing. This article is…
This isn’t racist.