+1

This is outstanding.

I don't know about you, but when my feet get tangled, I don't throw my hands and head back with a pained look. He looks like he got punched by a ghost.

The key is to go around the wall on the side they are supposed to be covering. Also, note that the wind changes. And yes pass to your teammate, but he will only hit it if it hits him in his end spot.

What is this "joke" you keep using on every article?

"HAD Weselyj not made the shot, Mercy would have lost four consecutive Class LL finals, making her Mercy's very own Jim Kelly."

Basically the bet for an O/U (over/under) means the book makes a line (130.5 in this case). You basically then choose if the total score from both teams will be above or below that score. This game ended at 131.

Do they have the news in realtime? He clearly states that as his reason in his original post. No reason to be snarky about it, especially if you're wrong.

+1

My grandpa always told me, "If you're willing to give a little in the cancer department, be prepared to get a little in the looks department."

As a gooner I would think you would realize that the guy named COYSCOYSCOYS is a Spurs fan...

Swing and a miss.

Swing and a miss.

Pretty much any hourly job.

You just took a fellow Bears fan through a roller coaster of emotion. +1

I don't mean a header at the top just to clarify, I mean a new heading for every section. And if you have those, I see no reason you need a horizontal rule, which would also follow the article's opinion.

I've always seen just using headings. Such as EDUCATION EXPERIENCE and making those stand out in order to show a separation.

Whether or not it works better is not what I'm saying. SurvivalHQ said this wasn't a folding board, which, yes it is.

Um. This is a DIY folding board.

He dunked over a guy. The physical act of dunking the ball was super impressive is all I'm saying. I also find it a questionable call, but that's for another discussion.