+1

That's very true. It's unfortunate, but I find since the adoption of Kinja, I can't even bother to read the comments section on any Apple article. There's just too much crap to sift through to find anything of value.

Fair point. Kinja!

I think I had repressed memories of fixing that.

Man the Linux haters are out in droves today.

Because not everyone needs every piece of software. Sure there are some things you can't get on linux (though there is usually a pretty great alternative), but that doesn't affect everyone. And Linux can be lighter or heavier than Windows, lots of variables as Linux comes in many flavors. Some people also just want to…

Was the "bettor" there a little pun?

Depends. Are we actually counting Noah? Without him the big men are severely lacking on that third team. When you have LeBron, Melo, and Durant you can get away with it, but not really these guys.

Because they have so much money sunk into Boozer. He should. I think he'll prove it this year. But I suppose that is just opinion.

Taj Gibson is one of the best defensive players in the game and an outstanding rebounder, who is not totally lost on the offensive side. He's Tyson Chandler without the minutes and a slightly better shot.

Seems like he coulda used someone else reading it for him too..

And I had just managed to block out the fact that he played for us...

You want to try that Steve Young one again? The QB you alluded to there was actually Jim McMahon. Steve Young does drink (didn't he recently get a DUI?), but he's no Jim McMahon.

What this guy said.

Just because it has a keyboard doesn't make it a laptop. The OS is really the limiting factor in making it a tablet That's why I argue they served different purposes.

Except the use of a CRT TV was still the same as the use for an HDTV today. My viewpoint is that that first tablet was really used as a laptop would be, except people wanted the ability to use a stylus, whereas the iPad, Surface, etc. are consumption media devices. Agree/disagree if you want, just saying, that's my…

I think that's what makes this play worse, the ball was never outside of the infield. Overthrows happen.

Sorry, my last response was supposed to be a wee bit sarcastic. I was pointing out that your point "they have absolutely zero interest in "Innovation" UNLESS it directly involves their bank account getting bigger" applies to every for-profit company.

I mean different type of technology. They served a different purpose.

Except the tablet from back then was supposed to function more like a laptop. They served different purposes than the tablets from now.