None of this makes sense to me. So racist white people want to excuse this person just because she is white, even though she has completely rejected her whiteness? And everyone else condemns this woman because she is a typical white person highjacking and exploiting black culture? Seems to me she is (1) a liar, (2)…

This is comedy gold. Or comedy blue. The more I look at it the harder it is to tell.

See this makes me wonder, was she ever trying to pass? Or did she just hang around Black people for long enough that people just started assuming she was Black and she never bothered to correct them?

We need a Lifetime movie to sort this hot-ass mess out. I suggest casting Emma Stone, she’s the only actress who could…

That’s what Rachel said.

Right? Forget about minorities that are struggling. White people should pretend to be minorities and take those scholarships away from them.

This is the second time you’re making this comment. Clearly you’re not interested in opposing opinions but I’ll make my piece anyway: I would be okay with this woman being in the NAACP and rocking these hairstyles if she was honest about her racial background. But that wasn’t enough for her. She had to take on the…

It’s pretty hard to think that someone like Rashida Jones and co. didn’t have an agenda of smearing given their selective depiction and given her past of slut-shaming. To be honest, the more I read from sites like Feminist Current and its ilk and the more I hear from Republican politicians, the more I realize social…

I feel like the author would have believed the CEO of Walmart had she asked him if they exploited workers.

Tom and David wants to drive each other, but Scientology prohibits it, so they turn it off like light switch and audit each other

Yes, I do think the point about there being room to react differently is a good one that I hadn’t thought of until you mentioned it. While I think the questions get to the heart of what she means to convey with the piece, I also think as Chief Queef says, that they essentially only provide the audience with a specific…

That’s funny, because that’s exactly the reason I didn’t like the piece. She anticipated a particular reaction from a particular audience and put it in text form in order to force a particular kind of complicity from them. It’s a closed loop with no room to breathe and no space provided for ambiguity or…

You don’t get to decide what is art. Only if you like it or not.

You can be a feminist and still poke fun at how ridiculous some feminists can be.

So, umm...her performance art follows the plot of “Funny Games”, but with rape? Umm, cool? I get it, but “YOU are also complicit by WATCHING this” is a really hackneyed artistic statement at this point.

See, I took it as whether you accept her explanation that it’s consensual and non-exploitive determined her consent. If you don’t believe her or you view it as objectification you are, by denial of her right to dictate what you saw, violating her consent. From that perspective I think I understand her point that…

KLONING

“We spoke to Jezebel, a popular Kardashian news site, on Twitter today...”

Bitch-in Camero

The problem with institutionalized trigger warnings is twofold.

There’s a practical problem of trigger warnings that doesn’t get addressed. There is no universal trauma trigger.