I don’t know if doomsaying is the same as predicting but it is close enough that I will say you were right.
I don’t know if doomsaying is the same as predicting but it is close enough that I will say you were right.
I went on foxnews.com last night after the election was called, and surprise to no one, they had about 50 articles about this published around the time things started to go south for Moore. I am sure that was a coincidence.
A couple of weeks ago I was so proud of myself. “See, Chris Paul was a detriment to this team!” I would crow. “Blake Griffn is going to win the MVP!” I would say only half jokingly.
They are also both tied for 20th best game.
He did not use the words, “I didn’t do that.” But he did use words that literally mean the same thing.
You are right, I didn’t initially realize that my response to you implied that I thought asking made it okay, but I now realize it does and that was definitely not my intention.
Tucked away in their mischaracterization of what was said was this nugget:
I am not saying him asking makes it okay or normal. There is still a power imbalance that makes the mere act of asking coercive and sexual harassment (as there was no pre-existing sexual relationship prior to the request). My entire point, and one that apparently isn’t popular, is that we need to be exact and correct…
You should really read before attacking.
I will as soon as you can point to a single article that Jezebel published that had the facts correct other than a broad, “CK masturbated in front of women.”
No one (yet) says that they told him no and he did it anyway. The problem was that when he asked he didn’t always wait for a response and that he didn’t always ask.
DRose for Bledsoe straight up.
This might be the most obvious tanking strategy since The Process (TM).
There is no evidence, literally zero, that the games media and Monolith Productions are corrupt. Literally, no evidence.
I am aware, but one makes you look like an idiot, which is why I object to it.
I am confused. Did we just become friends?
Ah, actually, if you workshopped it a little bit it could have been really funny. I actually just hate it when people spell “judgment” as “judgement” even though both are proper. One just makes you seem like an idiot (like POTUS).
Joi was sexualized, but for the vast majority of that time, it was not done in a male gaze or exploitative way, instead, it was done in a way to explore the boundaries of what is real and what is fake. Even with Joi, who is by far the most sexualized character, the majority of her screen time was coddling K, not…
You don’t really need to see the original to understand it, other than the Ford scenes, but even then there are sufficient contextual clues to understand what was happening (and most of the relevant plot dealing with his character was not actually in the first movie anyway).
Yea, I think they were so worried about ruining the plot of the movie in the promotion they failed to properly advertise the movie.