The question is the process. If the process is inconsistent, then its an issue. There’s no inconsistency in BYU’s prohibition of premarital sex, for example.

“The right to a college education is not guaranteed by the Constitution”

ACK! ‘Perhaps there are even victims’ should be ‘Perhaps there are even witnesses.’

“So how do you propose they discipline a student who sexually assaults another student?”

So Mapplethorpe’s work would not have been protested if he were a straight guy? Please.

It is the case. The questions about quality and privilege are valid in terms of critiquing it, and determining whether its any good.

It’s nuts. We on the left need to remember we’re not immune from authoritarianism.

Exactly. Something something punching down, something something inappropriate somethung

It’s crazy. Censorship in the name of virtue signaling. Depressing.

Who says you can’t be bothered with it? I think the question is whether it should be taken down.

It’s not different. Your comparison was apt because the basic demand in both cases is ‘Art that makes me upset needs to go away’.