sodas-and-fries
sodas-and-fries
sodas-and-fries

People feel they must form camps even when there’s no need to and it makes no sense to.

i don’t know why the 2 series would even be compared, tonally they are nothing alike.

Masterstroke of dialogue here, (and I’m paraphrasing)

Since the soundtracks are pretty much my favorite thing about the games, I will respectfully disagree.

I also feel like the TLOU and FO shows are taking two entirely different approaches, with TLOU’s being “let’s take this video game premise and tell it as realistically as possible” and Fallout’s being “make a new

The dog is named CX404. That’s the identification number stamped on her as a puppy, and later the subtitles refer to her as such.

Agreed this episode was fantastic no notes

I did not really compare the shows. I just suggested that if the OP was frustrated by the lack of answers, he might have a hard time with something like a Lynch film.

Late reply...but, I didn’t suggest it was the work of David Lynch. Or even in the ballpark. I was responding to the OP’s point about Lopez writing shit that didn’t have answers.

But isn’t that what makes the scientists’ actions all the more horrifying? They’re convinced they’re tapping into some magical thing that will save the world based on scant evidence and in the process take all kinds of lives because they’re so convinced they have found the solution to all the world’s problems.

I get the feeling that many of these comments are from folks that really don’t like shows with female detectives (unless they’re eye candy) - and don’t like shows directed and written by women - especially if they don’t have some boilerplate answer session at the end, like CSI.

If you’re not sure if the glass you’re about to shoot at is bulletproof or not, are you really going to risk ricochet in a small, enclosed room with a lot of metal surfaces?

It leaned on the supernatural, but I feel it wasn’t enough, nor did it seem to affect the characters enough, other than the ones who walked into the sea. Why were some able to fight the voices and others were not? So many “why’s” still unexplained.

I really enjoyed the ending as well even if it left some open ended stuff. But this episode made up for the last one that I thought was so-so.

I loved the whole season. I loved the supernatural over and undertones. I’m gobsmacked that there was a such a fantastic, moving, kick-ass explanation for what we all thought could not be explained: a bunch of assholes frozen on the ice. I’m enjoying how many people (judging by usernames mostly sporting penii) are

Your head will melt when you learn who David Lynch is.

Do you think the Bret Easton Ellis is a hack too?  Because he says American Psycho is open to interpretation?   Any writer once they publish something are giving an amount of control over tot he audience.   The audience is always free to interpret the work how they see fit.  

It’s worth watching.   I think it’s hilarious watching people froth at the mouth upset about a tv show.     

To be fair, bullets also richochet so maybe she was worried in that confined space of shooting herself

You’re a complete loser. 

I guess I’m in the minority, but I thought it was great. Good acting, fun writing. Danvers had awesome one-liners. I’m semi-frustrated at the things not fully explained (tongue!), but I’m ok with not all loose ends tied up.

Also, even though Season 1 is one of the best shows ever, fuck Nic Pizzolatto. He did this well