I’m so sorry we failed you, sweet boy.

Yeah brain injury, who cares.

I see this pic of her everywhere for one of those You Might Also Like links at the bottom of pages that leads to some suspicious site, using a headline like “What Donald Trump Doesn’t Want You To Know About His Other Daughter!”
EVERYWHERE.

Except that he actually is a fool, an obsessive, and a basket case.

Well, everyone who believes in facts and not made up crazy shit believes she’s innocent, yeah.

The truth is Rudy Guede raped and murdered Meredith Kercher. There’s nothing mysterious about it. He confessed. His DNA was on and in Meredith Kercher’s body. He accused Knox and Sollecito afterwards because it reduced his prison sentence by half.

I thought in the documentary they said Amanda’s DNA was on the handle (which is...normal? For a knife in a house you’ve been in?) but the DNA on the blade that was originally interpreted to be Meredith’s was actually inconclusive and almost certainly the result of contamination because they had everything that they…

It’s her own fault for skipping that ‘how to behave in a way that satisfies random internet commenters after being unexpectedly charged with a serious crime’ seminar that time. Silly girl.

I have examined the electropherograms related to the bra clasp myself. There are a minimum of two men (one of whom is not Guede) who contributed DNA to the clasp besides the profile that could be Sollecito’s. This suggests that at least some DNA arrived on the clasp in a way that is unrelated to the crime.

This is a fine article, but I have one quibble. The ordinary kitchen knife from Sollecito’s flat had Amanda’s DNA on the handle and was claimed to have a tiny (“low-template”) amount of DNA on the blade that belonged to Kercher. Independent experts in Italy carefully scrutinized the evidence and found it badly…

If you don’t think that the British tabloids didn’t have a vested financial interest in spinning  the narrative of the evil American who killed one of their own - an interest that has people convinced to this day of her guilt despite no evidence - you’re an idiot.

A large point of the documentary is how very, very wrong the media got it. So if you were following it closely through media stories, you were probably very misinformed (not your fault).

People don’t like that because it is a stupid question. Guede left behind a lot of physical evidence (he literally left a turd in the toilet) that could be tested for DNA. There was also other kinds of evidence like Guede’s bloody handprint on Kercher’s pillow (in what turned out to be Kercher’s blood). The two big…

You mean the tabloid press? Get real.

You might want to sit down for a while and read this. The Knox case was not Mignini’s first time at the Satanic cult rodeo.

You have your facts wrong and you should watch the documentary before commenting.

So? Murder victims would, of course, trade places with victims of justice-system misconduct. Murder victims would also trade places with victims of arson or kidnapping or medical malpractice or attempted murder. That doesn’t make a victim of a non-lethal crimes any less of a victim or make their victimization any less…

I am in awe of the people who still think she did it. The way people can grab on to the first thing they hear and believe it in spite of overwhelming evidence is so common it is scary.

It’s important to remember cases like this where media bias impacts criminal investigations and prosecutions. By remembering it, we can try our best to ensure it doesn’t happen to anyone else. It goes far beyond pretty girl tragedies (most of which are ignored by the media). The dingo baby case in Australia (link…

The obsession with Amanda Knox is totally obvious: a pretty, unmarried, white woman; had enough access and/or cash to study abroad; and *drumroll* was sexually active with multiple people.