Never heard of this concept before, but based on the rest of this article, it probably isn't a thing, and was imagined by the author. I will look into it. If I am wrong, just know that I was judging this statement on the merits of this article.

The only accurate diagram in this article.

Typically a Dyson Sphere is not a solid structure. No known material is capable of doing what this diagram describes. This "sphere" would most likely be made up of millions of small energy gathering orbital satellites. The flickers these stateliness would cause while eclipsing the star in our view range is what we…

Again, this infographic misrepresents what Planet X actually is. The creator of this image, and probably the article as well, is very misinformed on the Fermi Paradox. I would except this, if it were a paper, a solid C- at best.

Planet X is a different thing. Don't let this article confuse you.

You mean this thing that totally isn't only a nebula, that has nothing to do with our night sky?

Really, then why can you literally see the entire galaxy in the night sky with unaided vision? You know, the like 1/8th of the sky it covers. The huge vastly large thing that we kind of rotate around? This article is getting very inaccurate very fast.

The option arises when say; you are in the car alone. Some happenstancial situation occurs in which your accelerator is stuck and your brakes are not functioning, and you have already missed your only navigational exit. Your car has ran over cones seperating the working road from a road currently used for a parade…