snuffleupagus27
snuffleupagus27
snuffleupagus27

I have to say meh. 1. It’s clearly a pre-recorded track (look at their necks when they “sing” - their neck muscles are barely moving) and 2. I think she has the 4 guys there to help beef it up a bit. I’m sure she can hit the notes but it sounds kind of thin.

I think she has done some really good work but I am totally confused by her role choices. You know she has to be offered EVERYTHING. I am very torn on seeing this. I loved Alias and I love the Americans, so this seems up my alley except there’s something that feels so cheap-paperback about it.

Plus the fact that she’s never had much of a career outside SATC (not that any of the others have - my guess is they either aren’t worth the trouble or have a one-note range). But Willie Garson’s explanation sounds 100% believable based on what I know about Hollywood contract negotiations.

I have to 100% disagree. When my mother passed, I found the messages from my acquaintances on social media very supportive. I personally would rather offer support (and the person can ignore it if they don’t want it) than not offer anything. Also, re. private messages - those are nice too but I never thought anyone

I was kind of with you until your explanation. By this definition, track isn’t a sport but chess is. Sport should be “I can do this physical activity better than you by an objectively defined standard”.

It’s just kind of creepy that he would WANT to be the person doing the assaulting rather than letting either the other actor or a stunt coordinator do it. It sounds like he was getting off on it.

This one I actually get. It means he credited her with making him enough money that he could buy his house.

I think this has been covered in other articles, but these women tend to be Southern and are one-issue voters: abortion.

I typed a reply to you that disappeared (thanks Kinja) so trying again. As I posted in my other replies, there is no context with these allegations. And not all “crimes” are equal. I threw my keys at my ex during a very heated fight 20 years ago. Legally, he could have had me arrested for assault. Now imagine I’m a

As I’ve previously responded: Things like context, degrees of behavior, patterns of behavior, etc. should be taken into account. I threw my keys at a boyfriend years ago during a fight. That’s legally assault. I can only imagine how that would have turned out if I were a rich celebrity. I want to believe the victim

Yes many men haven’t done these things, possibly even some of the ones listed who were accused but never convicted - imagine that!

A lot of the issues mentioned weren’t rape, they were things like “assault”, which legally doesn’t even require you to touch the other person. That would be “battery”. What if a 19 year old boy and a 17 year old girl have consensual sex? He can be charged with rape and be on a sexual predator list for the rest of his

Ha! Although according to all the blind items, we’re supposed to hate her again now because she’s a controlling bitch. I can’t keep up anymore.

I just don’t like that we’re starting to pick people apart, and it seems to be based on popularity more than anything else. It’s so hypocritical. I’ve said this 100 times before - Dre threw a woman down a flight of stairs, but people still buy Beats. Terence Howard is an abuser but people are still watching Empire.

Same. Trying to believe the victim but also give someone the benefit of the presumption of innocence is a tightrope walk. It doesn’t help that it seems like everyone is out for the $$. When I got in a car accident, SO MANY people told me I should sue and I could probably get a big payday out of it. My injuries were

Funny, I didn’t see a MURDER charge in the article. But let’s stop acting like assault (which for all we know could be grabbing someone’s ass without asking permission) is equivalent to rape. It’s not. There is a reason that not every crime comes with a death sentence. And for the record, I did PLENTY of stuff 20

You know, at some point, we have to stop demanding perfection from people. If a guy had an incident with ONE woman TWENTY YEARS AGO where the allegation was DROPPED, to consider him a “bad” guy is pretty ridiculous. Let’s pull it back to being rational, people, this is how we end up being perceived as loony as the far

Have these people never seen movies in space before? A lack of sound is not unique in this genre. I’ve seen it so many times now that I didn’t even really notice it happening while watching the movie.

I don’t disagree with your entire statement, but let’s be real - housing and the property it sits has never been just “shelter”, it’s been a monetary asset since the beginning of time. McDonald’s, Church of Scientology - all sorts of groups have always increased their wealth through the acquisition of property. I’ve