The idiom is “to each his own.” It’s not even English in origin; it’s a Latin expression - “suum cuique” - of an earlier Greek principle. I added the “or her” since this is the internet and I didn’t want to get into it with someone screaming about the Patriarchy. I can cite a bunch of examples of this for you if you’d…

I just hate Fallon because he’s unfunny and smug, but to each their his or her own.

Yeah, you’re going to be waiting quite a while, as any .73 second Google search will show . . .

Oh, really. Well if all the data and analytics show that I guess I’m just wrong.

That’s a distinction without a difference. If your gripe is that people farther down the corporate food chain should get more money for what they do, make that case. The CEO’s salary is not relevant to that argument, and the point remains that many, many low-to-mid level employees are completely fungible, whereas…

Yeah, it’s not “technically correct.” It’s extremely technically incorrect to refer to a single person using a plural pronoun. It’s some sort of insane construct that has been appearing recently in articles like this - and in Twitter bios - and it’s a free country so people can do whatever they want, but it’s about as…

But if you do have a degree in business or accounting - or anything of any substance, really - you can absolutely see that this premise is asinine. If you are the leader of, and responsible for, a company that employees hundreds or thousands or tens of thousands of employees, and through your leadership that company…

How is there no mention of the AMAZEBALLS egg salad sandwhiches in an article about konbinis? These things don’t get the pub they deserve . . . everyone should have one as often as possible.

I have no idea what this response means, but the laziest generation thing comes from the first line in this article, and I am not a member of said generation.

I’m not sure missing school to stand around and hold signs does a lot toward dispelling the whole “laziest generation” thing, but good on these kids for doing something.

Go on, then. Let’s hear it.

Every fight in every hockey game starts with an agreement to drop the mitts. All of them. So I guess all hockey fights are dumb?

Why is this study limited to the counties in which the fullfillment center is situated rather than, say, the metropolitan area, and how have they accounted for population shifts, cross-county commuting, and the like?

And no reason to be picked. This reductionism is fun, isn’t it?!

Shhhh! Stop making sense! This isn’t about that - this space is reserved for OUTRAGE and SHOCK and a complete and utter lack of understanding as to the very basics of economics.

Someone doesn’t understand the difference between “Headquarters” and “distribution hubs.” Color me shocked . . .

He’s the richest man in history. Commrade Nolan, therefore, hates his fucking guts. Nothing complex about this.

Your lack of understanding vis-a-vis the US and Texas systems of taxation is, without a doubt, the best thing about this comment section. Nice job being both ignorant and verbose, holmes!

Competition - ever heard of it? I know it doesn’t fit into the socialist utopian agenda that has worked so incredibly well for rich and poor alike since 1917, but if there’s one additional HQ being awarded and 20 competitors for it, you’d better be offering a sweet deal or you aren’t going to be the one graced. You’re…

You understand that people - professionals or not - pay income, property, and other taxes that go to supporting the community, do you not? I’m not a math major or anything, but I strongly suspect that the tax revenue generated from those new professionals outweighs the tax revenue that would have been generated by…