snortsnort
sippy
snortsnort

Oh,please—-you’re really stretching it now. Diversity dosen’t have a damn thing to do with getting anybody censored—-you little comment didn’t make any damn sense—-tha’s why you bailed out when the other poster questioned you on it---because you didn’t have an answer to your question and it’s a stupid comment.

There is no rationale to his bull**** rants. He’s just become a whiny, bitter, jealous old hater whose time has passed, and he can’t deal with that, so he’d rather talk s*** about everybody simply because he can’t get the kind of films he used to make made anymore. Keep in mind, he hasn’t had a box office hit in 15

But how do you know that? Is that something you actually see going on right now, or is that only what you think is going to happen? The whole point of diversity is to break the pattern of always all white males only everywhere , and to reflect the reality of our country, which is getting more diverese by the day.

Diversity is simply a way of making sure that people with different voices and experiences get in the room and get a place at the table to be heard. Let’s be real—-white people have always hired each other on the shared basis of race since this country started—don’t pretend like that hasn’t always been going on.

They need to start bringing in more women then. Diversity initiatives only work if they’re made to work in the first place---they’re not going to just work all by themselves.

Why do you see diversity as something that is being “forced” on anybody? That’s a bunch of nonsense, especially as long as white men have dominated damn near every profession in existance in this country. Diversity is just a way of making damn sure people who have been excluded from certain professions forever and a

No, hes not. He’s just pissed off that his time as a director has passed, and he clearly can’t deal with how society has changed, and that white men and their stories on film are no longer the only game in town, like it was forever and a day, when it comes to the film business. As a white guy in a profession dominated

I always thought Chapman was the better-looking one out of all the Pythons,and just plain goofy as heck, but that Palin was the craziest and funniest one of them all. Saw Life of Brian for the first time starring Chapman (and Gilliam directing with a small silly role in it) and had fun seeing it. Still gotta catch up

Nobody said anything about the idiot-in-chief at all—-plus he has literally zero to do with this conversation. Everything does not revolve around voting for his sorry, pathetic con-man ass.

Actually, Girl 6 is his straight-up worst film to date, followed by She Hate Me. They’re both sloppy as hell, and really make no damn sense in a lot of parts. With Girl 6, it’s like he just threw that out there for the quick cash, and because his name was on it, not giving a single fuck about it, and it shows (even

Exactly—-Spike learned early on how to sell his films and start marketing himself, because being a struggling black indie filmmaker, he knew from the get-go that he wasn’t going to get the same opportunities as his white counterparts were at the time he was coming up (he’s talked about that in books he wrote about the

Why is Spike’s work “suspect”? In what way are you talking about? As much as I like Spike’s work, I’m the first to admit that a number of his film are big-time flawed, with issues, and sexist too, when it comes to female characters in his films. And, to be fair, he’s owned up to all that, and tried to actually change

Especially since white men have forever been hiring each other into professions (and still do) whether they’re qualified to be there or not, while excluding any who isn’t white or male from those same professions. Yet when the topic of hiring equally qualified people who aren’t white and male comes up, all of a sudden

Clearly, Gilliam took what the BBC exec said the wrong way. The BBC dude was saying how he’d be more inclined to look for a comedy group that a little more diverse today because diverse audiences like it. It was not a slam against Monty Python (whom I grew up on and liked a lot, with their insane, anarchic sketch

I cracked up so hard after I wrote this—-forgive the silliness, please. I know it’s not that great, but I tried, lol.

He pushed his member gently into her while pressing her up against the cool wall. “Hold on to me while you ride my d***, baby”. Meanwhile, she said, Yes, please push in it one inch more—ahhhh, aw s***, you hit my spot! Pump it up some more, baby, “ she howled in pleasure/cajoled/expressed her needs.

I used to read Roberts’ books all the time (also because she’s a damn good writer) and I own a couple of them too. That was great to read such a statement coming from her, calling the RWA out on its lack of support for both authors of color and LQBT authors. In today’s world, not supporting diverse authors of any

Aw, damn, that’s funny! We all know folks read romance for the sex scenes and the fun of people getting to know each other long enough to get to those sex scenes, lol. I have yet to see the term “womansplain” during a sex scene in a romance novel,though. Sine some of the best ones tend to be feminist in nature, I

Being a romance novel fan, this is relevant to me because I only read this article about the issues with diversity, and black authors having to call out what they see as racism (black romance authors getting overlooked, and not as well promoted as white authors in the same genre) in the romance genre only just over a

Nope, there sure as hell isn’t. That’s part of what makes us human, lol.