Nope, sorry. After you defend Gawker Media’s outing of a random gay man, you don't get to claim the moral high ground anywhere, Natasha. Read more
snats
snats
Can’t help but notice that ALL the comments about that shit-Gawker post were flat out DELETED over on the Unwed Mothers story a bit further down the page. I’M SURE IT WAS ONLY BECAUSE THEY WERE UNRELATED, YUP, THAT’S THE REASON. Read more
But, but the target was a person of “power.” Read more
THIS. Natasha....dear...fuck yourself. Read more
“outing a philaderer” is a hell of a euphemism for collaborating with a blackmailing grifter to destroy someone’s life for no reason but clicks. The obvious hypocrisy is that Gawker now feels an ethical obligation to protect the identities of the victims and not publish stolen nude videos, a policy it apparently… Read more
You’re a fucking joke, Natasha. Read more
Note: While there is a slight difference between this piece and the Gawker piece - in that the man being written about here did not contact Jezebel first to extort anyone, and he has [allegedly lololol] been doing illegal things, there is still SO MUCH HYPOCRISY here, and especially from you, Natasha, that all of the… Read more
Redacting names to protect people during potential investigations and legal litigation that there is no confirmation of here... Read more
You’re not taking his side? I thought you were all for invasion of privacy. Read more
It’s pretty impressive how she’s tanked her entire career in one tweet. It’s not like the sort of people who read her work have short memories. Read more
“...we are protecting their identities while they pursue legal action” Read more
Serious question for Natasha: if Roy had contacted you with these pictures and told you that he was attempting to blackmail one of the women but they wouldn’t pay him, would you have published his pictures of the woman in question and kept his identity secret? Read more
We've seen your Twitter Natasha. You have no issues protecting people who sexually prey on others. Read more
Natasha, you just wrote that: “Stories don’t need an upside. Not everyone has to feel good about the truth. If it’s true, you publish.” However, this story involves a plea of “no contest,” thereby rendering these ALLEGATIONS unproven. Your headline implies that all of these accusations have been proven in a court of… Read more
Kindly go fuck yourself Natasha. You are as much of a shit stain as the asshole you are writing about. Read more
Shouldn't you be helping Roy blackmail the women? Read more
You all should help with the blackmail. Read more
He should have filmed the executives of Gawker’s competitors. Read more
There ought to be a picture of you right next to the dictionary definition of hypocrisy. You’re the human personification of Feminism Lite. Read more
Jezebel spoke to two of the women who were secretly filmed by Roy; we are protecting their identities while they pursue legal action. Read more