Chuck Norris wouldn't wear a necklace mic. Chuck Norris would wear a honey badger holding a mic. Think about it.

florida handles florida thing in a florida way.

Bull fucking shit. I just bought a $5 fucking jumprope I can use to jump anywhere in my apartment. Jumping rope or even jumping jacks and sit ups work wonders.

I'm middle class so I just eat smaller portions.

As someone who works at a law firm, let me assure you: rich-ass lady lawyers luuuuuuuuurve their diet pills.

Clint Malarchuk wouldn't have missed a shift.

The machine was supposed to deliver change but ended up just going after people's arms? OBAMA'S AMERICA, AMIRITE???

Yeah, OK, but I'm pretty sure @ReillyRick had it first on Twitter.

People's audience is white, middle-class suburbia? I thought the target audience was people in the dentist's waiting room when all the copies of Highlights are already taken.

So what is the breakdown? Should it match the demographics of the world? The demographics of the US? The demographics of the English reading US? Or the demographics of the readership of people? I posit that it should match the readership of people and be tweaked as readership grows or slackens.

That is why I started with the issue of employment discrimination being bad, but giving zero shits about discriminating in content of the magazine, because you are free to run a magazine's content however you want.

I agree that employment discrimination is horrible, but magazine content is anyone's choice regardless of whether or not it is horrible. If you think People magazine is what is holding you back, I weep for your future.

That is like saying Ebony should make more articles about white people to increase their readership. Magazines are niche markets.

Yes, I am justifying their ability to make the choice as to what their magazine publishes...and if that is racist bullshit...then so be it. I don't think they have an ounce of social responsibility to acknowledge that the world has non-white people in it. That is what freedom is all about.

Would you suggest a…

What in the world makes you think that they don't acknowledge that the world is not full of only white people and that not only white people read their magazine?

Sorry but no. If you love "People" and the trite shit they publish, that sounds like a personal flaw you should work on, not something the rest of us should care about.

so a business can't choose what to print in their magazine? Does People have some social responsibility to fulfill that Biker Beat doesn't? It's a magazine

White suburban women are people, otherwise what would Jezebel do with all its time?

Is this really a legal issue? The only thing that could be interpreted as harassment is the alleged "this isn't Essence" comment, which, in fairness, is a perfectly reasonable thing to say among editors at a magazine that isn't Essence. I'm sure "This isn't Rolling Stone" or "this isn't the New York Times" has been…

I've always figured that was their market. It's not as if it's some high minded magazine designed to reach a broad array of people., it's vapid crap intended for a very clear target audience.