smike073
smike073
smike073

I just recently heard Erin Gloria on a podcast show called "Ask Roulette," in which she mentioned how glad she was to see photos from a reunion at her high school, how great it was that everyone had gotten "reeeeally faaaaaat heh heh heh heh." I just assumed she was a garbage person, but in light of this article,

Sadly, you're often seeing digital alterations of movie stars on film too. I worked for a visual effects company whose predominant work on one film was touching up a very famous actress' complexion - frame by frame. The movie release was delayed because of it..

Jezebel: uses "female colors" like dark red in their fucking logo; bitches about other companies trying to appeal to women by using "female colors".

If you read the letter they sent they acknowledge that they really liked the revision and the message that GoldieBlox was trying to make, but ultimately it is a commercial, and the band does not allow any of their music to be licensed for product promotions. I'm a pretty ardent supporter of GoldieBlox, but I have to

People who don't watch a show but read articles about that show and then yell at others that they have issues for watching the show have issues.

Rape shield laws needs to apply to the accused as well. Just look at the long and sordid history of false rape accusations, especially against prominent (often minority) athletes. If this man is found innocent, will you print a banner retraction?

It's an ad though, not a work of entertainment solely. That makes it different.

It probably wouldn't fall under fair use. The parody would have to be the product (like with Weird Al). Using parody to sell a product has generally been rejected as fair use.

The Beastie Boys will not only not ever perform that song, but they also won't allow it to be released in compilations or greatest hits.

It's a joke, son; a Nineteenth Century equivalent to the statement, "This looks shopped / I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time." See more here: http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/this-loo…

Please. Your post wasn't intended as a thank you—you never even said thank you. You just attacked anyone who has disagreed with you in the past about Anonymous being perfect and above criticism, and when people pointed out why Anonymous gets criticized, you screamed at them, called them trolls, and then deleted their

What in the everloving fuck.

The bystanders knew he had a gun,they knew he was dancing around erratically, they chose to be there. They're just as guilty as the gunmen.

No. they went to a wedding where people regularly take weapons and fire them into the air. If you do that, knowing what will happen and you get hit, you have no one to blame but yourself and the idiotic culture that seems to think firing automatic weapons at celebratory events is a good idea. Yemen has a huge problem

You're right on the stats being wrong. You're wrong about sociopathy and psychopathy being the same thing.

I'm guessing by being somewhat ignorant as to how the proposed idea would actually work...

Women cannot be judged by their clothing when walking down the street, involved in an assault, at a party, out drinking, etc, but now we can nitpick over somebody's tight fitting skirt because it's in a professional setting? Either women are responsible for the ideas attached to their clothing at all times, or at no

Are you suggesting they use ugly people to sell clothes?