Ice Tea was also really funny on last night's episode in the scene when they were looking at those websites..

One of the many reasons my wife and I LOVE that show.

Betty White is (usually) hilarious, and was awesome when she hosted (and appeared in every single skit on) SNL - but Off Their Rockers is one of the worst, most unfunny shows ever on TV.

...and nobody should be required to pay for those procedures but the people involved.

Insurance for elective procedures? Are there other elective procedures normally covered by insurance?

Oh, not complaining about the school thing, I'm totally in favor of paying for public schools. I'm just saying that parents are already getting help from other taxpayers (many whom do not have children) in that way, so to expect more subsidies to make their lives more convenient is rude, disrespectful, entitled...

Considering all taxpayers - including those of us who choose not to have children - pay for the public education & other resources for (other) peoples' kids, expecting us to also help pay for them to undergo expensive elective procedures so they can then have those kids when it is more convenient for them is just…

Not to mention; if they get subsidized egg freezing, what happens if they decide later on not to have kids at all? Would the government require they pay back the amount they got in subsidies? Or would they be legally required to have at least one child against their will? The whole idea is stupid.

Helpful? Sure. Sensible? No. There is absolutely no reason my tax dollars should be spent on anyone's decision to undergo an elective procedure.

Taxpayers should not have to pay for anyone's decision to undergo an elective procedure.

In what way does this clearly sleeved shirt masquerade as a tank top...?

I did click on it, but it's so long I don't have time to read it right now..

Not unreasonable at all. There are also worse things that public figures should be protecting their children from when it comes to posting their pics on the web. Additionally, it can also be interpreted as exploiting them for the purpose of engendering a certain perception of that artist / celebrity by the public. It…

Yup. I agree with you that it is possible to perceive the women's responses that way.

I am not saying you are a prude in the least, you are allowed you opinions and feelings - I am only speaking about facts here. And yes, I agree that victims of unwanted, non-consensual sexual contact are just in feeling violated. What this video depicts, however, is not considered sexual contact within the society in…

The video shows no "whipping out" nor "waving" of his penis. "For serious", you are interpreting the women's reaction based on your own opinions, formed by a life in a society that sees this in a different way than the society in which it happened.

You saw a video of a man naked in public and ridiculed hi penis. How is that different than me seeing nearly naked pics of Miley being broadcast to the public and ridiculing her body? If it is acceptable for you to ridicule this man's body, then it is acceptable for me (or anyone) to ridicule Miley's body.

Or, better yet - do research.

This is jezebel. Their stories don't involve actual research.

Because jezebel needs to fuel these stories so the press coverage of these kids gets way out of hand so they can later write more stories about how the press coverage of celebrities' kids is way out of hand and these kids should be left alone and people should stop harassing them. Also to up the chances that the kid…