No, it's a physical thing.
smike073
smike073
It's jezebel - women are always the victims here.
It was no more callous than what Grandpa's daughter did to his grandson. It was less callous, actually - as he closed with, "I[f] you find your heart, give us a call."
Did you click on this article? The reason these stories are posted is because people will click on them, thus generating the audience for them. Don't want to see these articles? Don't click on them. The fewer clicks they get, the less likely they are to appear. Protest and criticism is one of the most effective ways…
You are the one who is wrong here. "Shaming" a book store into not carrying a book is not a violation of anything, much less the First Amendment. First of all, the First Amendment has to do with the GOVERNMENT not being allowed to silence citizens. Second of all, the author is still allowed to write their books and to…
If book stores were required by law to carry every single book in production on the planet (or even just the country) there would be no book stores. Book stores have the right to choose what they sell. The First Amendment right to Free Speech has nothing to do with what books a store chooses to sell, it has to do…
If book stores were required by law to sell every single book in production throughout the world (or even just the country), there would be no book stores.
Not only is that not your decision to make for a business - but they likely made the decision based on the content of the books, not just the fact that one person complained.
Book stores have the right to choose which books they carry, just like consumers have the right to choose which books to read or which book stores to buy them from. Consumers are also free to let book stores know if they are carrying a book that they find offensive, and the book store can then decide whether or not to…
So, any book store that does not carry every single book in production throughout the entire world is "taking away a customer's choice" and thus censoring? A privately owned book store has a right to decide what they sell - they choose what to offer to potential customers, and potential customers can decide whether…
Many people do that as a punchline of sorts; before facebook started using hashtags and making them searchable, people would put them at the end of their status update with some sort of witty quip or whatever, and it truly is annoying. It made me want to comment with #thisisfacebooknottwitter to every single one, but…
Got a reply - they're working on it. Will definitely be watching the news tonight.
YES - do that! This guy needs the wrath of Seattle's entire news force to descend upon him, like NOW.
Well I do have to agree with you on the big, ugly amateurish ones.
Hopefully sooner rather than later, as I just emailed King 5 News about it.
..not to mention that this asshole is profiting off of those services and the homeless themselves.
Not to mention the fact that these slum-tourists are utilizing resources that exist to help the homeless (shelters, free meals, etc). If this is real, this guy is a complete fucking asshole. Hopefully we will find out more soon, as I just emailed King 5 News about it.
First sentence: "Revenge porn — or when a jerk posts private sexy photos of a woman online without her permission.."
They are not just sharing the bottle, he is using the suds from her head to wash his own hair. So he is putting the dirt, oil, mites, and dead skin cells from her scalp onto his.