What I don’t get in all these articles is there is always a caveat that Scalia was brilliant. His opinions, even putting the content aside, are not at all brilliant. Slippery slope arguments are the logic of internet trolls; but there’s a Supreme Court justice going all in on one. How is this ‘brilliant’? It’s lazy…

“Because Scalia, while brilliant,” - no. No, no, no.

Don’t forget this gem about people with intellectual disabilities: